TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of cytomegalovirus reactivation and tolerability in seropositive umbilical cord transplant patients after implementation of an intensive prevention strategy
AU - Rinehart, Matthew
AU - Hochard, Erica
AU - Rockey, Michelle
AU - Abhyankar, Sunil
AU - Ganguly, Siddhartha
AU - Lin, Tara
AU - McGuirk, Joseph
AU - Shune, Leyla
AU - Singh, Anurag
AU - Aljitawi, Omar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objective/Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity and mortality in CMV seropositive patients undergoing umbilical cord blood transplants (UCBT). Our study aimed to describe the incidence of CMV reactivation and burden of disease, as well as the tolerability of an intensive prevention strategy as compared to historical prevention. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of 33 CMV seropositive patients that underwent UCBT. The intensive prevention strategy in UCBT consisted of ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/d intravenously or valganciclovir 900 mg by mouth daily initiated at the beginning of the conditioning regimen until Day −2. Then from Day −1 to Day +100, patients received valacyclovir 2 g by mouth three times daily, and from Day +101 to Day +365, acyclovir 800 mg by mouth twice daily. Historical standard prevention was acyclovir 800 mg by mouth twice daily initiated at the beginning of the conditioning regimen until Day +365. Results Thirty-three patients were included from 2008 to 2014. There were no differences in the adverse effects experienced between the two regimens (p = .4). CMV reactivation occurred significantly later with intensive prevention (p = .003). The median CMV viral titer at reactivation was lower in the intensive versus the historic prevention (1,800 copies/mL and 2,700 copies/mL, respectively), but was not significantly different. CMV disease occurred significantly less often in the intensive group (p = .039). Conclusion The results from this study indicate that the intensive prevention strategy was well tolerated, significantly delayed CMV reactivation, and patients had less CMV disease.
AB - Objective/Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity and mortality in CMV seropositive patients undergoing umbilical cord blood transplants (UCBT). Our study aimed to describe the incidence of CMV reactivation and burden of disease, as well as the tolerability of an intensive prevention strategy as compared to historical prevention. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of 33 CMV seropositive patients that underwent UCBT. The intensive prevention strategy in UCBT consisted of ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/d intravenously or valganciclovir 900 mg by mouth daily initiated at the beginning of the conditioning regimen until Day −2. Then from Day −1 to Day +100, patients received valacyclovir 2 g by mouth three times daily, and from Day +101 to Day +365, acyclovir 800 mg by mouth twice daily. Historical standard prevention was acyclovir 800 mg by mouth twice daily initiated at the beginning of the conditioning regimen until Day +365. Results Thirty-three patients were included from 2008 to 2014. There were no differences in the adverse effects experienced between the two regimens (p = .4). CMV reactivation occurred significantly later with intensive prevention (p = .003). The median CMV viral titer at reactivation was lower in the intensive versus the historic prevention (1,800 copies/mL and 2,700 copies/mL, respectively), but was not significantly different. CMV disease occurred significantly less often in the intensive group (p = .039). Conclusion The results from this study indicate that the intensive prevention strategy was well tolerated, significantly delayed CMV reactivation, and patients had less CMV disease.
KW - CMV disease
KW - CMV reactivation
KW - CMV viremia
KW - Cytomegalovirus
KW - Intensive prevention
KW - Umbilical cord blood transplant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971657652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971657652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hemonc.2016.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.hemonc.2016.02.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 27013276
AN - SCOPUS:84971657652
SN - 1658-3876
VL - 9
SP - 105
EP - 111
JO - Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
JF - Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
IS - 3
ER -