TY - JOUR
T1 - Ethics Priorities of the Curing Coma Campaign
T2 - An Empirical Survey
AU - and the Curing Coma Campaign and its contributing members
AU - Lewis, Ariane
AU - Claassen, Jan
AU - Illes, Judy
AU - Jox, Ralf J.
AU - Kirschen, Matthew
AU - Rohaut, Benjamin
AU - Trevick, Stephen
AU - Young, Michael J.
AU - Fins, Joseph J.
N1 - Funding Information:
No direct funding was received for this study. JC has an R01 supplement for studying ethics implications of disorders of consciousness (3R01NS106014-02S1). MJY is supported by the National Institutes of Health Brain Initiative (F32MH123001) and the American Academy of Neurology (Palatucci Advocacy Award). JJF is supported by the National Institutes of Health Brain Initiative (1RF1MH12378-01) and the National Institutes of Health Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health (1DP2HD1010400-01). The other authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Keri Kim and Dr. Claude Hemphill for assistance distributing this survey and all the collaborators of the Curing Coma Campaign (see Supplemental Table 1).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background: The Curing Coma Campaign (CCC) is a multidisciplinary global initiative focused on evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, research, and prognostication for patients who are comatose due to any etiology. To support this mission, the CCC Ethics Working Group conducted a survey of CCC collaborators to identify the ethics priorities of the CCC and the variability in priorities based on country of practice. Methods: An electronic survey on the ethics priorities for the CCC was developed using rank-choice questions and distributed between May and July 2021 to a listserv of the 164 collaborators of the CCC. The median rank for each topic and subtopic was determined. Comparisons were made on the basis of country of practice. Results: The survey was completed by 93 respondents (57% response rate); 67% practiced in the United States. On the basis of respondent ranking of each topic, the prioritization of ethics topics across respondents was as follows: (1) clinical care, (2) diagnostic definitions, (3) clinical research, (4) implementation/innovation, (5) family, (6) data management, (7) public engagement/perceptions, and (8) equity. Respondents who practiced in the United States were particularly concerned about public engagement, the distinction between clinical care and research, disclosure of results from clinical research to families, the definition of “personhood,” and the distinction between the self-fulfilling prophecy/nihilism and medical futility. Respondents who practiced in other countries were particularly concerned about diagnostic modalities for clinical care, investigational drugs/devices for clinical research, translation of research into practice, and the definition of “minimally conscious state.” Conclusions: Collaborators of the CCC considered clinical care, diagnostic definitions, and clinical research the top ethics priorities of the CCC. These priorities should be considered as the CCC explores ways to improve evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, research, and prognostication of patients with coma and associated disorders of consciousness. There is some variability in ethics priorities based on country of practice.
AB - Background: The Curing Coma Campaign (CCC) is a multidisciplinary global initiative focused on evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, research, and prognostication for patients who are comatose due to any etiology. To support this mission, the CCC Ethics Working Group conducted a survey of CCC collaborators to identify the ethics priorities of the CCC and the variability in priorities based on country of practice. Methods: An electronic survey on the ethics priorities for the CCC was developed using rank-choice questions and distributed between May and July 2021 to a listserv of the 164 collaborators of the CCC. The median rank for each topic and subtopic was determined. Comparisons were made on the basis of country of practice. Results: The survey was completed by 93 respondents (57% response rate); 67% practiced in the United States. On the basis of respondent ranking of each topic, the prioritization of ethics topics across respondents was as follows: (1) clinical care, (2) diagnostic definitions, (3) clinical research, (4) implementation/innovation, (5) family, (6) data management, (7) public engagement/perceptions, and (8) equity. Respondents who practiced in the United States were particularly concerned about public engagement, the distinction between clinical care and research, disclosure of results from clinical research to families, the definition of “personhood,” and the distinction between the self-fulfilling prophecy/nihilism and medical futility. Respondents who practiced in other countries were particularly concerned about diagnostic modalities for clinical care, investigational drugs/devices for clinical research, translation of research into practice, and the definition of “minimally conscious state.” Conclusions: Collaborators of the CCC considered clinical care, diagnostic definitions, and clinical research the top ethics priorities of the CCC. These priorities should be considered as the CCC explores ways to improve evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, research, and prognostication of patients with coma and associated disorders of consciousness. There is some variability in ethics priorities based on country of practice.
KW - Coma
KW - Disorders of consciousness
KW - End-of-life
KW - Ethics
KW - United States
KW - Humans
KW - Coma/diagnosis
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85131375234
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131375234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12028-022-01506-2
DO - 10.1007/s12028-022-01506-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 35505222
AN - SCOPUS:85131375234
SN - 1541-6933
VL - 37
SP - 12
EP - 21
JO - Neurocritical Care
JF - Neurocritical Care
IS - 1
ER -