Abstract
In addition to redefining essential tremor (ET), the 2018 consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on tremor coined a new term: essential tremor-plus (ET-plus). This term is uncertainly defined as tremor with the characteristics of ET, with additional neurological signs of uncertain clinical significance. If ET-plus had been defined on the basis of a difference in underlying pathology or an appreciable difference in prognosis, it would have a valid, scientific rationale, as does the term Parkinson-plus. However, there is no such evidence, so the basis for the term is questionable. In fact, ET-plus might only represent a state condition (ie, patients with ET might develop these additional clinical features when the disease is at a more advanced stage). We caution against coining new terms that are not supported by a firm scientific basis and encourage research into the creation of essential tremor subsets that are defined with respect to differences in underlying causes or pathophysiology.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 266-270 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | The Lancet Neurology |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Consensus
- Essential Tremor/diagnosis
- Humans
- Tremor/diagnosis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology