TY - JOUR
T1 - Epithelial ingrowth after LASIK
T2 - Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and visual outcomes in patients requiring flap lift
AU - Henry, Christopher R.
AU - Canto, Ana Paula
AU - Galor, Anat
AU - Vaddavalli, Pravin K.
AU - Culbertson, William W.
AU - Yoo, Sonia H.
PY - 2012/7/1
Y1 - 2012/7/1
N2 - PURPOSE: To describe clinical characteristics, risk factors, and visual outcomes in patients requiring flap lift for epithelial ingrowth following LASIK. METHODS: Consecutive, noncomparative, retrospective case series of eyes requiring flap lift for epithelial ingrowth following LASIK from June 2003 through July 2011 at a tertiary care, university-based eye hospital. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 1 and 3 months and recurrence of epithelial ingrowth. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes were included. Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment was the most common etiologic factor for epithelial ingrowth (28/45 eyes [62%]). All patients were treated with flap lift and scraping. Mean logMAR UDVA at presentation was 0.28 (Snellen equivalent 20/38). Mean logMAR UDVA at 3 months was 0.17 (Snellen equivalent 20/30) with 53% of eyes 20/25 or better. Mean logMAR CDVA at 3 months was 0.06 (Snellen equivalent 20/23) with 78% of eyes 20/25 or better. Epithelial ingrowth into the central cornea portended a trend towards UDVA worse than 20/25 or worse at 3-month follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-31.3, P=.05) and CDVA worse than 20/25 at 3-month follow-up (HR 4.32, 95% CI: 0.85-21.9, P=.08). Recurrence after treatment was 31% at 3 months and 36% at 1 year. Risk factors for recurrence included: infectious etiology of ingrowth (HR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.11-29.1, P=.04), use of microkeratome for primary LASIK (HR 4.64, 95% CI: 1.07-20.1, P=.04), and hyperopic primary LASIK (HR 2.49, 95% CI: 0.98-6.31, P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing flap lift for the treatment of epithelial ingrowth have a relatively high rate of recurrence but good visual acuity outcomes.
AB - PURPOSE: To describe clinical characteristics, risk factors, and visual outcomes in patients requiring flap lift for epithelial ingrowth following LASIK. METHODS: Consecutive, noncomparative, retrospective case series of eyes requiring flap lift for epithelial ingrowth following LASIK from June 2003 through July 2011 at a tertiary care, university-based eye hospital. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 1 and 3 months and recurrence of epithelial ingrowth. RESULTS: Forty-five eyes were included. Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment was the most common etiologic factor for epithelial ingrowth (28/45 eyes [62%]). All patients were treated with flap lift and scraping. Mean logMAR UDVA at presentation was 0.28 (Snellen equivalent 20/38). Mean logMAR UDVA at 3 months was 0.17 (Snellen equivalent 20/30) with 53% of eyes 20/25 or better. Mean logMAR CDVA at 3 months was 0.06 (Snellen equivalent 20/23) with 78% of eyes 20/25 or better. Epithelial ingrowth into the central cornea portended a trend towards UDVA worse than 20/25 or worse at 3-month follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-31.3, P=.05) and CDVA worse than 20/25 at 3-month follow-up (HR 4.32, 95% CI: 0.85-21.9, P=.08). Recurrence after treatment was 31% at 3 months and 36% at 1 year. Risk factors for recurrence included: infectious etiology of ingrowth (HR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.11-29.1, P=.04), use of microkeratome for primary LASIK (HR 4.64, 95% CI: 1.07-20.1, P=.04), and hyperopic primary LASIK (HR 2.49, 95% CI: 0.98-6.31, P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing flap lift for the treatment of epithelial ingrowth have a relatively high rate of recurrence but good visual acuity outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864505583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864505583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20120604-01
DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20120604-01
M3 - Article
C2 - 22716032
AN - SCOPUS:84864505583
VL - 28
SP - 488
EP - 492
JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery
JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery
SN - 1081-597X
IS - 7
ER -