Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Endoscopic sinus surgery versus biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review with meta-analysis

H Majeethia, Z Mehdi, O G Ahmed, M Takashima, G A Kelley, J Lee, H H Ramadan, C A Makary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation, such as dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, have been developed to manage chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), particularly in patients with comorbid asthma or aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) remains the mainstay of treatment in patients who are refractory to medical therapy (1,2). However, direct comparisons between biologic therapy and FESS are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare sinonasal outcomes between FESS and biologic therapy in real-world settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalRhinology
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Jan 5 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic sinus surgery versus biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: a systematic review with meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this