End of life: Expert care and support, not physician-hastened death

Joseph C. Masdeu, Allen J. Aksamit, Alan C. Carver, Kathleen M. Foley, Joseph S. Kass, Raymond A. Martin, Elizabeth A. McCusker, Michael P. McQuillen, Raja Mehanna, Richard Payne, Stephen J. Victor, Steven Warach

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


In legal physician-hastened death, a physician prescribes medication with the primary intent of causing the death of a willing terminally ill patient. This practice differs radically from palliative sedation, intended to relieve a patient's suffering rather than cause a patient's death. In this position paper, we argue that the practice of physician-hastened death is contrary to the interests of patients, their families, and the sound ethical practice of medicine. Therefore, the American Academy of Neurology should advise its members against this practice, as it had done until 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-734
Number of pages6
Issue number17
StatePublished - Oct 22 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'End of life: Expert care and support, not physician-hastened death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this