TY - JOUR
T1 - Efforts to reduce seclusion and restraint use in a state psychiatric hospital
T2 - A ten-year perspective
AU - Madan, Alok
AU - Borckardt, Jeffrey J.
AU - Grubaugh, Anouk L.
AU - Danielson, Carla Kmett
AU - McLeod-Bryant, Stephen
AU - Cooney, Harriet
AU - Herbert, Joan
AU - Hardesty, Susan J.
AU - Frueh, B. Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Objective: The authors previously demonstrated an 82.3% reduction in seclusion and restraint use at an inpatient psychiatric facility, largely attributable to changes to the physical environment. This study investigated whether the reduction was sustained over time. Methods: This follow-up study examined archival data by using a longer preintervention baseline phase and examined the sustainability of intervention gains in the absence of a research agenda. Over ten years, 3,040 seclusion and restraint incidents were analyzed across 254,491 patient-days. Results: The extended baseline phase (N=38 months) exhibited a linear trend upward in seclusion and restraint use, and the formal intervention period and subsequent follow-up periods (N=82 months) showed a stabilization effect (p<.001). Conclusions: The findings suggest that reduction in seclusion and restraint use is sustainable, and judicious use of seclusion and restraint can become the new normative practice - even in the face of potentially disruptive administrative and environmental changes.
AB - Objective: The authors previously demonstrated an 82.3% reduction in seclusion and restraint use at an inpatient psychiatric facility, largely attributable to changes to the physical environment. This study investigated whether the reduction was sustained over time. Methods: This follow-up study examined archival data by using a longer preintervention baseline phase and examined the sustainability of intervention gains in the absence of a research agenda. Over ten years, 3,040 seclusion and restraint incidents were analyzed across 254,491 patient-days. Results: The extended baseline phase (N=38 months) exhibited a linear trend upward in seclusion and restraint use, and the formal intervention period and subsequent follow-up periods (N=82 months) showed a stabilization effect (p<.001). Conclusions: The findings suggest that reduction in seclusion and restraint use is sustainable, and judicious use of seclusion and restraint can become the new normative practice - even in the face of potentially disruptive administrative and environmental changes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907659623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907659623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201300383
DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201300383
M3 - Article
C2 - 25022602
AN - SCOPUS:84907659623
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 65
SP - 1273
EP - 1276
JO - Psychiatric Services
JF - Psychiatric Services
IS - 10
ER -