Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and compare in vivo the protective efficacy of unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) with that of deoxycholate amphotericin B (D-AmB) in experimental endocarditis. Material and Methods: In the rabbit model of experimental Aspergillus fumigatus endocarditis, two doses of each antifungal agent (1.5 mg/kg each) were administered intravenously at 4 hours and at 30 minutes before challenge with an inoculum of A. fumigatus. Three days later, the animals were sacrificed, and the aortic vegetations were analyzed. Results: All 19 animals that did not receive chemoprophylaxis acquired endocarditis. In contrast, endocarditis developed in 2 of 10 animals pretreated with D-AmB (P<0.01) and 3 of 8 animals pretreated with L-AmB (P<0.01). Both D-AmB and L-AmB prevented the development of endocarditis due to A. fumigatus and decreased the concentration of fungi in the aortic vegetations by more than 1 log10. Conclusion: In the rabbit experimental model of Aspergillus endocarditis, D- AmB and L-AmB were equally effective in reducing the incidence of the infection and the tissue burden of fungi.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1022-1027 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Mayo Clinic Proceedings |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1997 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Divisions
- Infectious Disease
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of deoxycholate amphotericin B and unilamellar liposomal amphotericin B in prophylaxis of experimental Aspergillus fumigatus endocarditis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS