Efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib with best supportive care versus best supportive care in patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization

Phillip Scheinberg, Matt R. Khoshnevis, Philip A. Robinson, Alfredo Guerreros, Victor A.H. Sato, Benedito A.L. Fonseca, Hans W. Prozesky, José Omar Chacón Romero, Laura Fogliatto, Barry R. Meisenberg, David J. Park, Ashok Gupta, Priti Patel, Danielle M. Townsley, Lianqing Zheng, Veerendra Munugalavadla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was evaluated in 2 phase 2 studies in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received acalabrutinib þ best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04380688 and NCT04346199). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients alive and free of respiratory failure on day 14 (rest of the world [RoW] study) and day 28 (US study). In the RoW study, 177 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib þ BSC: n ¼ 89; BSC: n ¼ 88); in the US study, 62 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib þ BSC: n ¼ 31; BSC: n ¼ 31). The percentage of patients who met the primary endpoint was similar in both studies (RoW study: acalabrutinib þ BSC: 83.1%, BSC: 90.9%; US study: acalabrutinib þ BSC: 80.6%, BSC: 83.9%). No new safety concerns were reported. Overall, no significant clinical benefit of adding acalabrutinib to BSC in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbervlaf023
JournalImmunoHorizons
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • acalabrutinib
  • best supportive care
  • bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor
  • COVID-19
  • hospitalized patients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib with best supportive care versus best supportive care in patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this