TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib with best supportive care versus best supportive care in patients with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization
AU - Scheinberg, Phillip
AU - Khoshnevis, Matt R.
AU - Robinson, Philip A.
AU - Guerreros, Alfredo
AU - Sato, Victor A.H.
AU - Fonseca, Benedito A.L.
AU - Prozesky, Hans W.
AU - Romero, José Omar Chacón
AU - Fogliatto, Laura
AU - Meisenberg, Barry R.
AU - Park, David J.
AU - Gupta, Ashok
AU - Patel, Priti
AU - Townsley, Danielle M.
AU - Zheng, Lianqing
AU - Munugalavadla, Veerendra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - The efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was evaluated in 2 phase 2 studies in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received acalabrutinib þ best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04380688 and NCT04346199). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients alive and free of respiratory failure on day 14 (rest of the world [RoW] study) and day 28 (US study). In the RoW study, 177 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib þ BSC: n ¼ 89; BSC: n ¼ 88); in the US study, 62 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib þ BSC: n ¼ 31; BSC: n ¼ 31). The percentage of patients who met the primary endpoint was similar in both studies (RoW study: acalabrutinib þ BSC: 83.1%, BSC: 90.9%; US study: acalabrutinib þ BSC: 80.6%, BSC: 83.9%). No new safety concerns were reported. Overall, no significant clinical benefit of adding acalabrutinib to BSC in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was observed.
AB - The efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, was evaluated in 2 phase 2 studies in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received acalabrutinib þ best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04380688 and NCT04346199). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients alive and free of respiratory failure on day 14 (rest of the world [RoW] study) and day 28 (US study). In the RoW study, 177 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib þ BSC: n ¼ 89; BSC: n ¼ 88); in the US study, 62 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib þ BSC: n ¼ 31; BSC: n ¼ 31). The percentage of patients who met the primary endpoint was similar in both studies (RoW study: acalabrutinib þ BSC: 83.1%, BSC: 90.9%; US study: acalabrutinib þ BSC: 80.6%, BSC: 83.9%). No new safety concerns were reported. Overall, no significant clinical benefit of adding acalabrutinib to BSC in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was observed.
KW - acalabrutinib
KW - best supportive care
KW - bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor
KW - COVID-19
KW - hospitalized patients
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007942214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105007942214&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/immhor/vlaf023
DO - 10.1093/immhor/vlaf023
M3 - Article
C2 - 40461100
AN - SCOPUS:105007942214
SN - 2573-7732
VL - 9
JO - ImmunoHorizons
JF - ImmunoHorizons
IS - 7
M1 - vlaf023
ER -