TY - JOUR
T1 - Editorial Commentary
T2 - What Exactly Is Impingement—Can Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging “See” Impingement in Femoroacetabular Impingement?
AU - Harris, Joshua D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author reports the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: J.D.H. receives support from Arthroscopy, Smith and Nephew, Depuy Synthes, Xodus Medical, SLACK, and NIA Magellan. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material. The author reports the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: J.D.H. receives support from Arthroscopy, Smith and Nephew, Depuy Synthes, Xodus Medical, SLACK, and NIA Magellan. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - The diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome requires that 3 prerequisites are met. Patient symptoms and physical examination must be combined with imaging to appropriately make the diagnosis. Imaging, including plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography, should be interpreted in the context of a high prevalence of cam and pincer morphology, in addition to labral injury, in the general population. All images routinely obtained in current clinical practice are 2-dimensional representations of complex 3-dimensional processes. Although computerized modeling can dynamically manipulate femur and pelvis independently in fluoroscopy-, computed tomography-, and/or MRI-based collision detection models, the exact definition of “impingement” eludes the current literature. High-resolution, high magnet strength (minimum 3 Tesla), physiologic and/or biochemical dynamic MRI has the potential to image both soft and osseous tissues, interacting to best define hip impingement.
AB - The diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome requires that 3 prerequisites are met. Patient symptoms and physical examination must be combined with imaging to appropriately make the diagnosis. Imaging, including plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography, should be interpreted in the context of a high prevalence of cam and pincer morphology, in addition to labral injury, in the general population. All images routinely obtained in current clinical practice are 2-dimensional representations of complex 3-dimensional processes. Although computerized modeling can dynamically manipulate femur and pelvis independently in fluoroscopy-, computed tomography-, and/or MRI-based collision detection models, the exact definition of “impingement” eludes the current literature. High-resolution, high magnet strength (minimum 3 Tesla), physiologic and/or biochemical dynamic MRI has the potential to image both soft and osseous tissues, interacting to best define hip impingement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071280356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071280356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.009
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 31395173
AN - SCOPUS:85071280356
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 35
SP - 2375
EP - 2379
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 8
ER -