Abstract
In a Level IV evidence systematic review of 16 studies comparing arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis, both techniques showed good or excellent short-term subjective and objective clinical outcomes in 98% of subjects. Ultimately, technique selection may be based on surgeon preference. In open tenodesis, one should avoid vigorous medial retraction to mitigate the risk of nerve injury.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 372-373 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine