Editorial Commentary: Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis - You Choose

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In a Level IV evidence systematic review of 16 studies comparing arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis, both techniques showed good or excellent short-term subjective and objective clinical outcomes in 98% of subjects. Ultimately, technique selection may be based on surgeon preference. In open tenodesis, one should avoid vigorous medial retraction to mitigate the risk of nerve injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)372-373
Number of pages2
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial Commentary: Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis - You Choose'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this