Abstract
Both the quality and quantity of reporting in the SLAP repair literature, especially the surgical indications and technical intraoperative characteristics, leaves significant room for improvement. In their systematic review, Kibler and Sciascia identify this considerable underlying imprecision. Based on the current literature, no consensus exists for establishing any criteria for a successful SLAP repairdsurgical indications, characteristics (type, location, number of anchors), completeness of repair, or rehabilitation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 684-685 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial Commentary: On Kibler & Sciascia: What Did the Five Fingers Say to the Face? SLAP. A Systematic Review Wake-Up Call to Improve SLAP Repair Guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS