Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Joint Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Double-Bundle Techniques Are Anatomically and Biomechanically Favored

Sachin Allahabadi, Jorge Chahla

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

For coracoclavicular (CC) joint reconstruction in the setting of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint Rockwood type III or V dislocations, flexible fixation shows better clinical outcomes and complication rates than rigid fixation. Single-bundle CC reconstruction reconstructs the conoid ligament but poorly controls anteroposterior stability and is nonanatomic in nature. Thus, we favor double-bundle CC reconstruction incorporating a trapezoid bundle, replicating the broad insertion of the CC ligaments. Biomechanical data confirm improved stability with double-bundle, flexible fixation reconstruction, especially with the lateral clavicular tunnel in a more posterolateral location. An early clinical outcome study supports the double-bundle approach; meticulous surgical technique is required to avoid double-trouble complication rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-224
Number of pages3
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Joint Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Double-Bundle Techniques Are Anatomically and Biomechanically Favored'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this