TY - JOUR
T1 - Dyspepsia
T2 - How should we measure it?
AU - Kuykendall, David H.
AU - Rabeneck, Linda
AU - Campbell, Catherine J.M.
AU - Wray, Nelda
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported here was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service. Dr. Rabeneck is the recipient of a Department of Veterans Affairs HSR&D Career Development Award. The authors thank Lorraine W. Foote, R.N., for assistance with patient recruitment.
Copyright:
Copyright 2007 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1998/2
Y1 - 1998/2
N2 - This study developed and validated a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia. A questionnaire was administered to 126 patients with dyspepsia who presented for care at a VA outpatient clinic and a family physician's private office. Dyspepsia-specific health was measured by self-report using: (1) an existing dyspepsia scale that produces an aggregate score by summing ratings across pain an non-pain symptoms; (2) adaptations of two scales originally designed to measure back pain; and (3) a new scale measuring satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. Generic health was measured using the SF-36. Results from factor analysis revealed four dimensions of dyspepsia-related health: pain intensity, pain disability, non-pain symptoms, and satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. After refinements, scales representing the four dimensions conformed to psychometric standards for reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. The importance of measuring dyspepsia using a multidimensional approach was confirmed by demonstrating that classification of dyspepsia severity depended on the dimension that was assessed. We conclude that dyspepsia is best measured using a multidimensional approach.
AB - This study developed and validated a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia. A questionnaire was administered to 126 patients with dyspepsia who presented for care at a VA outpatient clinic and a family physician's private office. Dyspepsia-specific health was measured by self-report using: (1) an existing dyspepsia scale that produces an aggregate score by summing ratings across pain an non-pain symptoms; (2) adaptations of two scales originally designed to measure back pain; and (3) a new scale measuring satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. Generic health was measured using the SF-36. Results from factor analysis revealed four dimensions of dyspepsia-related health: pain intensity, pain disability, non-pain symptoms, and satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. After refinements, scales representing the four dimensions conformed to psychometric standards for reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. The importance of measuring dyspepsia using a multidimensional approach was confirmed by demonstrating that classification of dyspepsia severity depended on the dimension that was assessed. We conclude that dyspepsia is best measured using a multidimensional approach.
KW - Dyspepsia
KW - Health status
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031884946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031884946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00245-X
DO - 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00245-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 9474070
AN - SCOPUS:0031884946
VL - 51
SP - 99
EP - 106
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
SN - 0895-4356
IS - 2
ER -