Does an improvement in cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring data lead to a reduced risk for postoperative neurologic deficit in spine deformity surgery?

Nathan J. Lee, Lawrence G. Lenke, Mitchell Yeary, Alexandra Dionne, Chidebelum Nnake, Michael Fields, Matthew Simhon, Ted Shi, Varun Arvind, Anastasia Ferraro, Matthew Cooney, Erik Lewerenz, Justin L. Reyes, Steven Roth, Chun Wai Hung, Justin K. Scheer, Thomas Zervos, Earl D. Thuet, Joseph M. Lombardi, Zeeshan M. SardarRonald A. Lehman, Fthimnir M. Hassan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if an improvement in cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data following data loss results in a reduced risk for new postoperative motor deficit in pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgery. Methods: A consecutive series of 1106 patients underwent spine surgery from 2015 to 2023 by a single surgeon. Cord alerts were defined by Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials (SSEP; warning criteria: 10% increase in latency or > 50% loss in amplitude) and Motor-Evoked Potentials (MEP; warning criteria: 75% loss in amplitude without return to acceptable limits after stimulation up 100 V above baseline level). Timing of IONM loss and recovery, interventions, and baseline/postoperative day 1 (POD1) lower extremity motor scores were analyzed. Results: IONM Cord loss was noted in 4.8% (53/11,06) of patients and 34% (18/53) with cord alerts had a POD1 deficit compared to preoperative motor exam. MEP and SSEP loss attributed to 98.1% (52/53) and 39.6% (21/53) of cord alerts, respectively. Abnormal descending neurogenic-evoked potential (DNEP) was seen in 85.7% (12/14) and detected 91.7% (11/12) with POD1 deficit. Abnormal wake-up test (WUT) was seen in 38.5% (5/13) and detected 100% (5/5) with POD1 deficit. Most cord alerts occurred during a three-column osteotomy (N = 23/53, 43%); decompression (N = 12), compression (N = 7), exposure (N = 4), and rod placement (N = 14). Interventions were performed in all 53 patients with cord loss and included removing rods/less correction (N = 11), increasing mean arterial pressure alone (N = 10), and further decompression with three-column osteotomy (N = 9). After intervention, IONM data improved in 45(84.9%) patients (Full improvement: N = 28; Partial improvement: 17). For those with full and partial IONM improvement, the POD1 deficit was 10.7% (3/28) and 41.2% (7/17), respectively. For those without any IONM improvement (15.1%, 8/53), 100% (8/8) had a POD1 deficit, P < 0.001. Conclusion: A full or partial improvement in IONM data loss after intraoperative intervention was significantly associated with a lower risk for POD1 deficit with an absolute risk reduction of 89.3% and 58.8%, respectively. All patients without IONM improvement had a POD1 neurologic deficit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere14160
Pages (from-to)261-272
Number of pages12
JournalSpine Deformity
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Kyphosis
  • Neuroimaging
  • Neurophysiology
  • Quality improvement
  • Scoliosis
  • Spinal cord injury
  • Spinal deformity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does an improvement in cord-level intraoperative neuromonitoring data lead to a reduced risk for postoperative neurologic deficit in spine deformity surgery?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this