Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury

Jonathan C. Bardin, Joseph J. Fins, Douglas I. Katz, Jennifer Hersh, Linda A. Heier, Karsten Tabelow, Jonathan P. Dyke, Douglas J. Ballon, Nicholas D. Schiff, Henning U. Voss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

241 Scopus citations

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging methods hold promise for the identification of cognitive function and communication capacity in some severely brain-injured patients who may not retain sufficient motor function to demonstrate their abilities. We studied seven severely brain-injured patients and a control group of 14 subjects using a novel hierarchical functional magnetic resonance imaging assessment utilizing mental imagery responses. Whereas the control group showed consistent and accurate (for communication) blood-oxygen-level-dependent responses without exception, the brain-injured subjects showed a wide variation in the correlation of blood-oxygen-level-dependent responses and overt behavioural responses. Specifically, the brain-injured subjects dissociated bedside and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based command following and communication capabilities. These observations reveal significant challenges in developing validated functional magnetic resonance imaging-based methods for clinical use and raise interesting questions about underlying brain function assayed using these methods in brain-injured subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-782
Number of pages14
JournalBrain
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Keywords

  • blunt-head injury
  • brain stem
  • cognitive impairment
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • minimally conscious state

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this