Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differences in lectin binding of malignant pleural mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung

T. Kawai, S. D. Greenberg, Luan Truong, C. A. Mattioli, M. Klima, J. L. Titus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In order to differentiate between malignant pleural mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung, the glycoconjugate profiles of 6 reactive mesothelial lesions, 23 mesotheliomas (17 epithelial, 1 desmoplastic, 2 biphasic, and 3 fibrous types), and 28 well-differentiated pulmonary adenocarcinomas were evaluated with the use of 8 lectins in addition to anti-carcinoembryonic, anti-keratin and anti-epithelial membrane antigen. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were stained with the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method. Reactions of wheat germ (WGA) and peanut (PNA) agglutinin with neuraminidase treatment lectins were positive in 5 of 6 (83%) and 3 of 6 (50%) cases, respectively, in reactive mesothelial lesions. Thirteen of 23 (57%) malignant mesotheliomas of the pleura showed a positive reaction for WGA and PNA with neuraminidase treatment; other lectins were low-positive, below 9%. In contrast, pulmonary adenocarcinomas showed positive reactions in 27 of 28 cases (96%) for PNA, 26 of 28 (93%) for Ricinus communis (RCA-I), 25 of 28 (89%) for WGA, and 22 of 28 (79%) for succinylated WGA (SucWGA). The findings suggest that malignant pleural mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma have consistent and distinct glycoconjugate profiles, and that stains for RCA-I and SucWGA may be useful for differential diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-410
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Pathology
Volume130
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in lectin binding of malignant pleural mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma of the lung'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this