Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnostic Performance of LIVERFASt as a Non-invasive Liver Fibrosis Test: Data from Three Cohorts of Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Naim Alkhouri, Parvez Mantry, Humberto C. Gonzalez, Rashmee Patil, Vicki McIntyre, Anita Kohli, Madhavi Rudraraju, Joseph Frank Kosinski, Bradley S. Vander Veen, Whitfield L. Knapple, Ravi Ravinuthala, Prasun Kumar Jalal, Sanjaya K. Satapathy, Bal Raj Bhandari, Christopher J. Christensen, Victor Ankoma-Sey, Quynh An Phan, Fernando E. Membreno, Gabriel H. Lee, Sudha KodaliAbdullah Mubarak, Hany A. Elbeshbeshy, Robert P. Morin, Reed B. Hogan, Harry E. Sarles, Brigitte Le Bail, Jean Baptiste Hiriart, Juliette Foucher, Faiza Chermak, Marie Decraecker, Pamela Sylvestre, Matthew M. Yeh, Ronald Quiambao, Kimberly Mangee, James Tonascia, Medhi Sakka, Rana Alkouri, Maxime Deregnaucourt, Dominique Bonnefont-Rousselot, Stephen A. Harrison, Imtiaz Alam, Mona Munteanu, Meena Bansal, William Alazawi, Arun J. Sanyal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

AIM: This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of the novel blood-based device, LIVERFASt to detect fibrosis stages in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), including those with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), compared to FIB-4 in a subgroup analysis. METHODS: LIVERFASt is computed with 10 blood biomarkers and four anthropometric measures and provides a quantitative score (0.00-1.00) to stage cirrhosis (F4), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and clinically significant fibrosis (≥F2). Three cohorts of patients (two retrospective and one prospective) from tertiary centers in Europe and the U.S. with histological-proven biopsy were used to assess LIVERFASt and FIB-4 diagnostic performance using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity (Sn), specificity, and predictive values (PV) for varying fibrosis prevalence levels. RESULTS: 497 MASLD adult patients were included (median age 56 years, 56.7% female, 50.3% T2DM, 44.1% advanced fibrosis, and 20.1% cirrhosis). In the pooled analysis, the AUROCs for fibrosis stages F4, ≥F3, and ≥F2 were: 0.868, 0.846, 0.748, as well as for the T2DM subgroup (n=250): 0.846, 0.798, 0.736, respectively. For 35% advanced fibrosis prevalence, the positive/negative PVs were 77.2%/81.3% for the overall cohort and 65.52%/79.81% for the subgroup with tT2DM, respectively. At high (90%) to low (1%) advanced fibrosis prevalences, the positive and negative PVs ranged from 93% to 4.28% and from 43.06% to 99.73%, respectively. For F4 and ≥F3 fibrosis stages, LIVERFASt outperformed FIB-4: AUROC 0.870 vs 0.851 and 0.874 vs 0.821 (p<0.01), with Sn 74.07 vs 48.15 and 65.54 vs 37.29, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIVERFASt is a highly sensitive and clinically useful diagnostic test for staging fibrosis in MASLD patients, including those with T2DM and has a higher Sn for detecting advanced fibrosis when compared with FIB-4.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)437-450
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 26 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic Performance of LIVERFASt as a Non-invasive Liver Fibrosis Test: Data from Three Cohorts of Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this