Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diagnostic error in mental health: a review

Andrea Bradford, Ashley N.D. Meyer, Sundas Khan, Traber D. Giardina, Hardeep Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Diagnostic errors are associated with patient harm and suboptimal outcomes. Despite national scientific efforts to advance definition, measurement and interventions for diagnostic error, diagnosis in mental health is not well represented in this ongoing work. We aimed to summarise the current state of research on diagnostic errors in mental health and identify opportunities to align future research with the emerging science of diagnostic safety. We review conceptual considerations for defining and measuring diagnostic error, the application of these concepts to mental health settings, and the methods and subject matter focus of recent studies of diagnostic error in mental health. We found that diagnostic error is well understood to be a problem in mental healthcare. Although few studies used clear definitions or frameworks for understanding diagnostic error in mental health, several studies of missed, wrong, delayed and disparate diagnosis of common mental disorders have identified various avenues for future research and development. Nevertheless, a lack of clear consensus on how to conceptualise, define and measure errors in diagnosis will pose a barrier to advancement. Further research should focus on identifying preventable missed opportunities in the diagnosis of mental disorders, which may uncover generalisable opportunities for improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)663-672
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 19 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic error in mental health: a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this