Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict myocardial blood flow and clinical outcomes from patients’ electrocardiograms

Fares Alahdab, Maliazurina Binti Saad, Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed, Qasem Al Tashi, Muhammad Aminu, Yushui Han, Jonathan B. Moody, Venkatesh L. Murthy, Jia Wu, Mouaz H. Al-Mallah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We develop a machine learning (ML) model using electrocardiography (ECG) to predict myocardial blood flow reserve (MFR) and assess its prognostic value for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Using 3,639 ECG-positron emission tomography (PET) and 17,649 ECG-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) data pairs, the ML model is trained with a swarm intelligence approach and support vector regression (SVR). The model achieves a receiver-operator curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.75. An ECG-MFR value below 2 is significantly associated with MACE, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 3.85 and 3.70 in the discovery and validation phases, respectively. The model's C-statistic is 0.76, with a net reclassification improvement (NRI) of 0.35. Validated in an independent cohort, the ML model using ECG data offers superior MACE prediction compared to baseline clinical models, highlighting its potential for risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) using the accessible 12-lead ECG.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101746
JournalCell Reports Medicine
Volume5
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2024

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • coronary artery disease
  • electrocardiography
  • machine learning
  • major adverse cardiovascular events
  • myocardial blood flow
  • positron emission tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict myocardial blood flow and clinical outcomes from patients’ electrocardiograms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this