TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a novel operator performance measure for procedural tasks based on safety-II perspective
AU - Son, Changwon
AU - Peres, S. Camille
AU - Sasangohar, Farzan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper proposes a novel framework to evaluate procedural task performance from a Safety-II perspective. While deviations from procedural steps have been a major focus of Safety-I approach, the novel framework aims to capture human operators’ adaptive behaviors and efforts in accomplishing higher-level goals. By adopting abstraction hierarchy, four levels of goal hierarchy embedded in a procedure are modeled: System, operation, task, and step. The current framework focuses on the relationship between task-level goals and step-level goals, given that a primary use of procedures occurs at a task level. Based on the framework, four types of procedural task performance are proposed: Type-I positive and negative outcomes, and Type-II positive and negative outcomes. Using the four types of outcome performance, novel quantitative measures to evaluate operators’ adaptive and maladaptive procedural performance are suggested. Challenges and work in progress associated with the proposed measurement are also presented.
AB - This paper proposes a novel framework to evaluate procedural task performance from a Safety-II perspective. While deviations from procedural steps have been a major focus of Safety-I approach, the novel framework aims to capture human operators’ adaptive behaviors and efforts in accomplishing higher-level goals. By adopting abstraction hierarchy, four levels of goal hierarchy embedded in a procedure are modeled: System, operation, task, and step. The current framework focuses on the relationship between task-level goals and step-level goals, given that a primary use of procedures occurs at a task level. Based on the framework, four types of procedural task performance are proposed: Type-I positive and negative outcomes, and Type-II positive and negative outcomes. Using the four types of outcome performance, novel quantitative measures to evaluate operators’ adaptive and maladaptive procedural performance are suggested. Challenges and work in progress associated with the proposed measurement are also presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171308137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85171308137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071181320641425
DO - 10.1177/1071181320641425
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85171308137
SN - 1071-1813
VL - 64
SP - 1755
EP - 1759
JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
IS - 1
T2 - 64th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2020
Y2 - 5 October 2020 through 9 October 2020
ER -