TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and Integration of a Texting Tool to Keep Patients’ Family Members Updated During Hospitalization
T2 - Clinicians’ Perspectives
AU - Bruce, Courtenay R.
AU - Kamencik-Wright, Ashleigh
AU - Zuniga-Georgy, Natalie
AU - Vinh, Thomas M.
AU - Shah, Hema
AU - Shallcross, Jamie
AU - Giammattei, Charlie
AU - O’Rourke, Colleen
AU - Smith, Mariana
AU - Bruchhaus, Lindsey
AU - Bowens, Yashica
AU - Goode, Kimberley
AU - Arabie, Lee Ann
AU - Sauceda, Katherine
AU - Pacha, Majeedah
AU - Martinez, Sandra
AU - Chisum, James
AU - Benjamin Saldaña, R.
AU - Nicholas Desai, S.
AU - Awar, Melina
AU - Vernon, Thomas R.
N1 - © The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - An important gap in the literature is how clinicians feel about patient-centered technologies and how clinicians experience patient-centered technologies in their workflows. Our goal was to identify clinician users’ perspectives on facilitators (pros) and barriers (cons) to using 1 digital texting innovation to promote family centered care during patients’ hospitalizations. This qualitative study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Houston, consisting of 7 hospitals (1 academic hospital and 6 community hospitals), involving analyzation of 3 focus groups of 18 physicians, 5 advanced practice providers, and 10 nurse directors and managers, as well as a content analysis of 156 real-time alerts signaling family dissatisfaction on the nursing unit/floor. Thematic analysis methods were used. We selected these participants by attending their regularly scheduled service-line meetings. Clinician feedback from focus groups resulted in 3 themes as facilitators: (a) texting platforms must be integrated within the electronic medical record; (b) texting reduces outgoing phone calls; (c) texting reduces incoming family phone calls. Clinician feedback resulted in 3 themes as barriers: (a) best practice alerts can be disruptive; (b) real-time alerts can create hopelessness; and (c) scale-up is challenging. The analyzation of facilitators (pros) and barriers (cons) pertains only to the clinician's feedback. We also analyzed real-time alerts signaling family dissatisfaction (defined as “service recovery escalation” throughout this manuscript). The most common selection for the source of family dissatisfaction, as reflected through the real-time alerts was, “I haven’t heard from physicians enough,” appearing in 52 out of 156 alerts (33%). The second most common selection for the source of dissatisfaction was “perceived inconsistent or incomplete information provided by team members,” which was selected in 48 cases (31%). Our findings indicate that clinicians value inpatient texting, not only for its ability to quickly relay updates to multiple family members with 1 click, but also because, when used intentionally and meaningfully, texting decreases family phone calls.
AB - An important gap in the literature is how clinicians feel about patient-centered technologies and how clinicians experience patient-centered technologies in their workflows. Our goal was to identify clinician users’ perspectives on facilitators (pros) and barriers (cons) to using 1 digital texting innovation to promote family centered care during patients’ hospitalizations. This qualitative study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Houston, consisting of 7 hospitals (1 academic hospital and 6 community hospitals), involving analyzation of 3 focus groups of 18 physicians, 5 advanced practice providers, and 10 nurse directors and managers, as well as a content analysis of 156 real-time alerts signaling family dissatisfaction on the nursing unit/floor. Thematic analysis methods were used. We selected these participants by attending their regularly scheduled service-line meetings. Clinician feedback from focus groups resulted in 3 themes as facilitators: (a) texting platforms must be integrated within the electronic medical record; (b) texting reduces outgoing phone calls; (c) texting reduces incoming family phone calls. Clinician feedback resulted in 3 themes as barriers: (a) best practice alerts can be disruptive; (b) real-time alerts can create hopelessness; and (c) scale-up is challenging. The analyzation of facilitators (pros) and barriers (cons) pertains only to the clinician's feedback. We also analyzed real-time alerts signaling family dissatisfaction (defined as “service recovery escalation” throughout this manuscript). The most common selection for the source of family dissatisfaction, as reflected through the real-time alerts was, “I haven’t heard from physicians enough,” appearing in 52 out of 156 alerts (33%). The second most common selection for the source of dissatisfaction was “perceived inconsistent or incomplete information provided by team members,” which was selected in 48 cases (31%). Our findings indicate that clinicians value inpatient texting, not only for its ability to quickly relay updates to multiple family members with 1 click, but also because, when used intentionally and meaningfully, texting decreases family phone calls.
KW - MHealth technology
KW - effectiveness
KW - family centered care
KW - family decision making
KW - mHealth interventions
KW - patient activation
KW - patient engagement
KW - patient experience
KW - patient safety
KW - patient-centered care
KW - quality improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150894346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150894346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23743735231160423
DO - 10.1177/23743735231160423
M3 - Article
C2 - 36968007
AN - SCOPUS:85150894346
SN - 2374-3735
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Patient Experience
JF - Journal of Patient Experience
ER -