TY - JOUR
T1 - Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing six cycles of FEC-100 to four cycles of AC in women with operable node-negative breast cancer
T2 - the NSABP B-36 trial (NRG Oncology)
AU - Geyer, Charles E.
AU - Bandos, Hanna
AU - Rastogi, Priya
AU - Jacobs, Samuel A.
AU - Robidoux, André
AU - Fehrenbacher, Louis
AU - Ward, Patrick J.
AU - Polikoff, Jonathan
AU - Brufsky, Adam M.
AU - Provencher, Louise
AU - Paterson, Alexander H.G.
AU - Hamm, John T.
AU - Carolla, Robert L.
AU - Baez-Diaz, Luis
AU - Julian, Thomas B.
AU - Swain, Sandra M.
AU - Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
AU - Wolmark, Norman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Purpose: Results from adjuvant trials evaluating 6 cycles of epirubicin-based chemotherapy regimens suggested these programs may be more effective than 4 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Method: NSABP B-36 was a phase III clinical trial originally designed as a 2 × 2 factorial study comparing 6 cycles of 5-FU, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-100) to 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with celecoxib or placebo. Shortly after activation, concerns regarding increased cardiovascular risks among selective COX-2 inhibitors resulted in a decision to remove the celecoxib/placebo from the trial. Women with histologically node-negative invasive breast cancer who had undergone primary surgery with a lumpectomy or total mastectomy were eligible. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Between May 2004 and July 2008, 2722 patients were enrolled. Administration of FEC-100 did not result in improvement in DFS compared to AC (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92–1.29, p value = 0.31). The effect of FEC-100 compared to AC on DFS was significantly different for receptor-positive (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05–1.66) compared to receptor-negative patients (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66–1.11) (treatment-by-receptor status interaction p value = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the effect of treatment on overall survival (OS) with FEC-100 compared to AC (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.84–1.35, p value = 0.61). Overall, Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent in the FEC-100 group. Conclusion: The results of B-36 do not support use of six-cycle anthracycline-based regimens in node-negative breast cancer. Prolongation of anthracycline-based therapy with FEC-100 does not improve DFS or OS, relative to AC for 4 cycles, and was associated with expected increases in toxicity. A statistically significant interaction between treatment and hormone receptor status favoring AC in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers is consistent with the hypothesis that optimal duration of chemotherapy may be four cycles in these patients. Late cardiac events and deaths prior to recurrence or second cancer were infrequent on both arms, but slightly higher with FEC-100. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00087178.
AB - Purpose: Results from adjuvant trials evaluating 6 cycles of epirubicin-based chemotherapy regimens suggested these programs may be more effective than 4 cycles of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Method: NSABP B-36 was a phase III clinical trial originally designed as a 2 × 2 factorial study comparing 6 cycles of 5-FU, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-100) to 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) with celecoxib or placebo. Shortly after activation, concerns regarding increased cardiovascular risks among selective COX-2 inhibitors resulted in a decision to remove the celecoxib/placebo from the trial. Women with histologically node-negative invasive breast cancer who had undergone primary surgery with a lumpectomy or total mastectomy were eligible. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Between May 2004 and July 2008, 2722 patients were enrolled. Administration of FEC-100 did not result in improvement in DFS compared to AC (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.92–1.29, p value = 0.31). The effect of FEC-100 compared to AC on DFS was significantly different for receptor-positive (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05–1.66) compared to receptor-negative patients (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66–1.11) (treatment-by-receptor status interaction p value = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in the effect of treatment on overall survival (OS) with FEC-100 compared to AC (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.84–1.35, p value = 0.61). Overall, Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were more frequent in the FEC-100 group. Conclusion: The results of B-36 do not support use of six-cycle anthracycline-based regimens in node-negative breast cancer. Prolongation of anthracycline-based therapy with FEC-100 does not improve DFS or OS, relative to AC for 4 cycles, and was associated with expected increases in toxicity. A statistically significant interaction between treatment and hormone receptor status favoring AC in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers is consistent with the hypothesis that optimal duration of chemotherapy may be four cycles in these patients. Late cardiac events and deaths prior to recurrence or second cancer were infrequent on both arms, but slightly higher with FEC-100. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00087178.
KW - Anthracyclines
KW - Duration of therapy
KW - Node-negative breast cancer
KW - Doxorubicin/adverse effects
KW - Humans
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Cyclophosphamide
KW - Mastectomy
KW - Female
KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
KW - Epirubicin
KW - Anthracyclines/therapeutic use
KW - Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Celecoxib/therapeutic use
KW - Fluorouracil
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124791437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124791437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-021-06417-y
DO - 10.1007/s10549-021-06417-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 35230585
AN - SCOPUS:85124791437
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 193
SP - 555
EP - 564
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 3
ER -