TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients
AU - Scoggins, Marion E.
AU - Fox, Patricia S.
AU - Kuerer, Henry M.
AU - Rauch, Gaiane M.
AU - Benveniste, Ana P.
AU - Park, Young Mi
AU - Lari, Sara A.
AU - Krishnamurthy, Savitri
AU - Yang, Wei T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Roentgen Ray Society.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Objective. The objective of our study was to compare the sonographic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions with the initial clinical presentation and histopathologic findings. Materials and Methods. The images and records of 691 patients with pure DCIS who underwent preoperative mammography and whole-breast sonography as part of staging workup in a single institution from January 1, 1996, through July 31, 2009, were reviewed. The BI-RADS sonography lexicon was used when reviewing the sonographic studies. Histopathologic features recorded included estrogen receptor (ER) status, nuclear grade, and presence or absence of comedonecrosis. Statistical comparisons were made using the Student t test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon rank sum test, multiple logistic regression analysis, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. A total of 304 (44%) tumors were visible on mammography and sonography; 315 (46%), on mammography only; 58 (8%), on sonography only; and 14 (2%), on neither mammography nor sonography. The most common sonographic appearance of DCIS was an irregular hypoechoic mass with indistinct margins and normal posterior features that was indistinguishable from invasive carcinoma. Patients with symptomatic high-nuclear-grade DCIS, dense breasts, and comedonecrosis were younger and had larger tumors on sonography than asymptomatic women with nondense breasts and low-nuclear-grade and noncomedo DCIS. Women with ER-negative DCIS were older and had larger tumors on sonography than women with ER-positive DCIS. ER-negative tumors were more frequently visible on sonography than ER-positive tumors (p = 0.007). High-grade DCIS (p > 0.0001) and comedo DCIS (p > 0.0001) presented more frequently as microcalcifications, architectural distortion, and ductal changes on sonography than low-grade DCIS or noncomedo DCIS. Conclusion. Of the 691 pure DCIS lesions, 362 (52%) were visible on sonography and presented most commonly as a mass. Lesion visibility of DCIS on sonography was not related to nuclear grade or the presence of comedonecrosis.
AB - Objective. The objective of our study was to compare the sonographic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions with the initial clinical presentation and histopathologic findings. Materials and Methods. The images and records of 691 patients with pure DCIS who underwent preoperative mammography and whole-breast sonography as part of staging workup in a single institution from January 1, 1996, through July 31, 2009, were reviewed. The BI-RADS sonography lexicon was used when reviewing the sonographic studies. Histopathologic features recorded included estrogen receptor (ER) status, nuclear grade, and presence or absence of comedonecrosis. Statistical comparisons were made using the Student t test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon rank sum test, multiple logistic regression analysis, and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results. A total of 304 (44%) tumors were visible on mammography and sonography; 315 (46%), on mammography only; 58 (8%), on sonography only; and 14 (2%), on neither mammography nor sonography. The most common sonographic appearance of DCIS was an irregular hypoechoic mass with indistinct margins and normal posterior features that was indistinguishable from invasive carcinoma. Patients with symptomatic high-nuclear-grade DCIS, dense breasts, and comedonecrosis were younger and had larger tumors on sonography than asymptomatic women with nondense breasts and low-nuclear-grade and noncomedo DCIS. Women with ER-negative DCIS were older and had larger tumors on sonography than women with ER-positive DCIS. ER-negative tumors were more frequently visible on sonography than ER-positive tumors (p = 0.007). High-grade DCIS (p > 0.0001) and comedo DCIS (p > 0.0001) presented more frequently as microcalcifications, architectural distortion, and ductal changes on sonography than low-grade DCIS or noncomedo DCIS. Conclusion. Of the 691 pure DCIS lesions, 362 (52%) were visible on sonography and presented most commonly as a mass. Lesion visibility of DCIS on sonography was not related to nuclear grade or the presence of comedonecrosis.
KW - Breast neoplasm
KW - Ductal carcinoma in situ
KW - Mammography
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929630278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929630278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.13.12221
DO - 10.2214/AJR.13.12221
M3 - Article
C2 - 25794082
AN - SCOPUS:84929630278
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 204
SP - 878
EP - 888
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 4
ER -