TY - JOUR
T1 - coreNASH
T2 - Multi-stakeholder Consensus on Core Outcomes for Decision Making About Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Treatment
AU - the coreNASH Panel
AU - Clearfield, Elizabeth
AU - Miller, Veronica
AU - Nadglowski, Joseph
AU - Barradas, Katherine
AU - Al Naber, Jennifer
AU - Sanyal, Arun J.
AU - Neuschwander-Tetri, Brent A.
AU - Messner, Donna A.
AU - Baldyga, William
AU - Balp, Maria Magdalena
AU - Brun-Strang, Catherine
AU - Carson, Robyn
AU - Eskridge, Wayne
AU - Gurusamy, Kurinchi
AU - Hansen, Lars
AU - Hansen, Morten
AU - Harrison, Katy
AU - Harsanyi, Andras
AU - Hvelplund, Anders
AU - Kaló, Zoltán
AU - Korenjak, Marko
AU - Milne, E. J.
AU - McLeod, Euan
AU - Mocarski, Michelle
AU - Musaeus, Joachim
AU - Ntanios, Fady
AU - Noureddin, Mazen
AU - Ollendorf, Daniel
AU - Oscarsson, Jan
AU - Rossi, Stephen
AU - Ratziu, Vlad
AU - Rotman, Yaron
AU - Ruiz-Casas, Leonardo
AU - Sandy, Lewis
AU - Schattenberg, Jörn M.
AU - Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab
AU - Steinberg, Gregory
AU - Weiss, Ethan
AU - White, Keith
AU - Willemse, José
AU - Wright, Kathy
AU - Zemel, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Hepatology Communications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - The increasing prevalence and burden of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has spurred the development of new treatments and a need to consider outcomes used for NASH treatment decision making. Development of a NASH core outcome set (COS) can help prioritize outcomes of highest importance by incorporating the perspectives from a variety of decision makers. coreNASH was an initiative to develop a COS for NASH using a modified Delphi consensus process with a multi-stakeholder voting panel. A candidate outcome list was created based on a literature review and key informant interviews. The candidate outcome list was then condensed and prioritized through three rounds of online voting and through discussion at an in-person meeting. Outcomes were retained or eliminated based on predetermined consensus criteria, which included special weighting of patients’ opinions in the first two voting rounds. The coreNASH Delphi panel included 53 participants (7 patients, 10 clinicians and researchers, 7 health technology assessors, 22 industry representatives, 2 regulators, and 5 payers) who considered outcomes for two NASH-related COS: one for NASH without cirrhosis (F2-F3) and one for NASH with cirrhosis (F4). The initial candidate outcome list for both disease stages included 86 outcomes. The panel agreed on including two core outcomes for NASH without cirrhosis and nine core outcomes for NASH with cirrhosis in the COS. Conclusion: A consensus-based COS has been developed that can be used across the life cycle of NASH treatments. Outcomes included can contribute to decision making for regulatory, market access, and on-market decision making. Including the coreNASH COS in clinical development programs will facilitate improved comparisons and help decision makers assess the value of new products.
AB - The increasing prevalence and burden of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has spurred the development of new treatments and a need to consider outcomes used for NASH treatment decision making. Development of a NASH core outcome set (COS) can help prioritize outcomes of highest importance by incorporating the perspectives from a variety of decision makers. coreNASH was an initiative to develop a COS for NASH using a modified Delphi consensus process with a multi-stakeholder voting panel. A candidate outcome list was created based on a literature review and key informant interviews. The candidate outcome list was then condensed and prioritized through three rounds of online voting and through discussion at an in-person meeting. Outcomes were retained or eliminated based on predetermined consensus criteria, which included special weighting of patients’ opinions in the first two voting rounds. The coreNASH Delphi panel included 53 participants (7 patients, 10 clinicians and researchers, 7 health technology assessors, 22 industry representatives, 2 regulators, and 5 payers) who considered outcomes for two NASH-related COS: one for NASH without cirrhosis (F2-F3) and one for NASH with cirrhosis (F4). The initial candidate outcome list for both disease stages included 86 outcomes. The panel agreed on including two core outcomes for NASH without cirrhosis and nine core outcomes for NASH with cirrhosis in the COS. Conclusion: A consensus-based COS has been developed that can be used across the life cycle of NASH treatments. Outcomes included can contribute to decision making for regulatory, market access, and on-market decision making. Including the coreNASH COS in clinical development programs will facilitate improved comparisons and help decision makers assess the value of new products.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105968395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105968395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hep4.1678
DO - 10.1002/hep4.1678
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85105968395
SN - 2471-254X
VL - 5
SP - 774
EP - 785
JO - Hepatology Communications
JF - Hepatology Communications
IS - 5
ER -