Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel medical device to provide cooling anesthesia to the eye as local anesthesia for intravitreal injections. Study Design: First in human, open-label study of 43 subjects assessed at three different doses: −10°C for 20 seconds (group 1), −15°C for 15 seconds (group 2), and −15°C for 20 seconds (group 3). Main outcome measures were safety and pain of injection using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Results: Cooling anesthesia did not result in any serious ocular adverse events. One grade 1 adverse event was a vasovagal response during cooling administration which resolved immediately after cooling. Mean NRS scores at the time of injection for each group ranged from 2.5 to 4.3 There was a statistically significant difference between pain scores of the 3 groups at injection in aggregate but not in pairwise comparisons (P value = 0.047). There was a statistically significant decrease in pain from injection to 5 minutes post injection in all groups (P value = 0.00008, 0.003, 0.0005 for groups 1, 2, 3, respectively) as well as from 5 minutes to 24–48 hours (P value = 0.00001, 0.018, and 0.0545 for groups 1, 2, 3, respectively). Conclusion: The rapid cooling anesthesia device was well tolerated for achieving local anesthesia among patients receiving intravitreal injections with no serious ocular adverse events.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4659-4666 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Clinical Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 15 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Anesthesia
- Cooling
- Intravitreal injection
- Pain
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ophthalmology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cooling Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injection: Results of the Prospective Open-Label, Dose-Ranging COOL-1 Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS