Abstract
Societal perceptions of the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment after severe brain injury have been influenced by the legacies of the right-to-die movement and psychosurgery. Here I propose an ethical stereotaxy for severe brain injury that balances risks, benefits and access to this neglected population, in light of advances in cognitive neuroscience.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 323-327 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Nature Reviews Neuroscience |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2003 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Constructing an ethical stereotaxy for severe brain injury: Balancing risks, benefits and access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS