Abstract

Background: The significant improvement of patient outcomes from minimally invasive lung surgery has led to the development of advanced lung nodule localization techniques to help manage patients with small suspicious lung nodules or to help resect patients with small pulmonary metastases. However, there are no clear computed tomography (CT) criteria to guide the use of advanced localization techniques for this group of patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who had undergone initial wedge resection of single or multiple lung nodules. We collected demographics, surgical information and surgical outcomes as well as CT scan features. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine which factors were most predictive of the need for advanced localization techniques Results: A total of 45 patients (73%) were resected by direct identification alone while 17 patients (27%) required advanced localization techniques. Of those requiring advanced localization, 11 patients had cone beam CT, 3 patients had transbronchial localization using electromagnetic navigation and 3 patients had preoperative CT guided wire localization. Patients requiring advanced localization had significantly smaller lung nodules at 0.8 cm compared to 1.4 cm (P=0.01), nodules that were further away from the pleura at 1.3 cm compared 0.1 cm (P
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3390-3398
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Thoracic Disease
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Keywords

  • Computed tomography guided localization (CT guided localization)
  • Cone beam computed tomography (cone beam CT)
  • Lung cancer
  • Lung nodule
  • Navigation bronchoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Divisions

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Computed tomography criteria for the use of advanced localization techniques in minimally invasive thoracoscopic lung resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this