TY - JOUR
T1 - Composite active drag control in turbulent channel flows
AU - Yao, Jie
AU - Chen, Xi
AU - Hussain, Fazle
N1 - Funding Information:
Computational resources provided by Texas Tech University HPCC and TACC Lonestar are acknowledged. We appreciate M. Lee and R. D. Moser for providing us their DNS code, which is used for this study. X.C. appreciates the funding support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grants No. 12072012, No. 11721202, and No. 91952302.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Physical Society.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - A composite drag control (CDC) combining the opposition (OC) and spanwise opposed wall-jet forcing (SOJF) methods is studied in a turbulent channel flow via direct numerical simulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. A maximum drag reduction of about 33% is obtained for CDC - much higher than that produced by either individual method (namely, 19% for SOJF and 23% for OC). Due to the small power input required for both OC and SOJF methods, a significant net power saving (about 32%) is achieved via CDC. Flow analysis shows that CDC can take advantage of both OC and SOJF methods to better suppress drag producing near-wall turbulent structures - vortices and streaks. In particular, due to the presence of the large-scale coherent swirls generated by SOJF, it is more effective than OC in suppressing the random turbulence. Moreover, due to the OC's role in suppressing random small-scale turbulence, CDC requires weaker large-scale coherent swirls than those using SOJF only - hence decreasing the drag contribution associated with large-scale swirls. In summary, our results suggest prospects of employing composite control strategy for effective skin friction drag reduction, particularly at very high Reynolds numbers.
AB - A composite drag control (CDC) combining the opposition (OC) and spanwise opposed wall-jet forcing (SOJF) methods is studied in a turbulent channel flow via direct numerical simulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. A maximum drag reduction of about 33% is obtained for CDC - much higher than that produced by either individual method (namely, 19% for SOJF and 23% for OC). Due to the small power input required for both OC and SOJF methods, a significant net power saving (about 32%) is achieved via CDC. Flow analysis shows that CDC can take advantage of both OC and SOJF methods to better suppress drag producing near-wall turbulent structures - vortices and streaks. In particular, due to the presence of the large-scale coherent swirls generated by SOJF, it is more effective than OC in suppressing the random turbulence. Moreover, due to the OC's role in suppressing random small-scale turbulence, CDC requires weaker large-scale coherent swirls than those using SOJF only - hence decreasing the drag contribution associated with large-scale swirls. In summary, our results suggest prospects of employing composite control strategy for effective skin friction drag reduction, particularly at very high Reynolds numbers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106358796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106358796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.054605
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.054605
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85106358796
SN - 2469-990X
VL - 6
JO - Physical Review Fluids
JF - Physical Review Fluids
IS - 5
M1 - 054605
ER -