TY - JOUR
T1 - Complications of abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction in obese patients
T2 - A meta-analysis and case series
AU - Wolfswinkel, Erik Matthew
AU - Weathers, William M.
AU - Bhadkamkar, Mohin A.
AU - Bullocks, Jamal
AU - Izaddoost, Shayan
AU - Hollier, Larry H.
AU - Brown, Rodger H.
PY - 2013/12
Y1 - 2013/12
N2 - Background: Obese patients now constitute a larger proportion of women seeking postmastectomy reconstruction. Achieving optimal results with a low number of complications in the obese population is challenging. This meta-analysis compares the complication risks for obese and nonobese patients receiving abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective case series of obese and nonobese patients undergoing abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction was performed and included in the meta-analysis. A literature search yielded 103 citations, and multilevel screening identified 7 relevant studies. An eight study meta-analysis, using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects models, compared pooled relative risks for complications. Results: There was a twofold risk of infection (relative risk (RR), 1.97; 95 % CI, 1.23, 3.14), two and one half times the risk of mastectomy flap necrosis (RR, 2.61; CI, 1.62, 4.20), and partial flap loss (RR, 2.62; CI, 1.23, 5.59) for obese patients compared to nonobese patients. Additionally, there was a fourfold increase in risk for total flap loss (RR, 4.12; CI, 1.01, 16.79) and donor-site seroma (RR, 4.03; CI, 2.46, 6.59). There was no significant difference in the risk for overall donor-site complications between the two populations (RR, 1.09; CI, 0.58, 2.05). Conclusions: The findings reveal that obese patients have a higher risk of complications than nonobese patients receiving abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction. As we move toward a pay-for-performance reimbursement system, appropriate risk adjustments will be a vital component, allowing provision of optimal treatment techniques for obese patients.
AB - Background: Obese patients now constitute a larger proportion of women seeking postmastectomy reconstruction. Achieving optimal results with a low number of complications in the obese population is challenging. This meta-analysis compares the complication risks for obese and nonobese patients receiving abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective case series of obese and nonobese patients undergoing abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction was performed and included in the meta-analysis. A literature search yielded 103 citations, and multilevel screening identified 7 relevant studies. An eight study meta-analysis, using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects models, compared pooled relative risks for complications. Results: There was a twofold risk of infection (relative risk (RR), 1.97; 95 % CI, 1.23, 3.14), two and one half times the risk of mastectomy flap necrosis (RR, 2.61; CI, 1.62, 4.20), and partial flap loss (RR, 2.62; CI, 1.23, 5.59) for obese patients compared to nonobese patients. Additionally, there was a fourfold increase in risk for total flap loss (RR, 4.12; CI, 1.01, 16.79) and donor-site seroma (RR, 4.03; CI, 2.46, 6.59). There was no significant difference in the risk for overall donor-site complications between the two populations (RR, 1.09; CI, 0.58, 2.05). Conclusions: The findings reveal that obese patients have a higher risk of complications than nonobese patients receiving abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction. As we move toward a pay-for-performance reimbursement system, appropriate risk adjustments will be a vital component, allowing provision of optimal treatment techniques for obese patients.
KW - Abdominal based
KW - Breast
KW - DIEP
KW - Free TRAM
KW - Microsurgery
KW - MS-TRAM
KW - Obese
KW - Reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892365671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892365671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00238-013-0858-8
DO - 10.1007/s00238-013-0858-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84892365671
SN - 0930-343X
VL - 36
SP - 765
EP - 776
JO - European Journal of Plastic Surgery
JF - European Journal of Plastic Surgery
IS - 12
ER -