Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair

Rodger H. Brown, Anuradha Subramanian, Cindy S. Hwang, Shirong Chang, Samir S. Awad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Infection can be a devastating complication associated with prosthetic incisional hernia repair. It is unclear whether the type of mesh used affects the risk of infection. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent elective incisional hernia repair with permanent prosthetic mesh between January 1, 2000, and August 1, 2007. Results: A total of 176 patients underwent elective incisional hernia repair with mesh. The overall infection rate with the use of goretex (Flagstaff, AZ, USA) was 12 of 86 (14%) and 2 of 90 (2.2%) in cases in which nongoretex material was used (P =.016). In the goretex group, infection rates were significantly higher in open versus laparoscopic cases (26.5% vs 5.8%, P =.030). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism recovered. Conclusions: The risk of mesh infection with the use of goretex was found to be higher than with the use of nongoretex mesh. Laparoscopic placement of goretex reduces this risk of infection. No significant differences in recurrence rates were found.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-187
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume205
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Goretex
  • Incisional hernia
  • Infection
  • Mesh
  • Ventral hernia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of infectious complications with synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this