Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]MK6240 for the detection of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease (HEAD): a multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional, within-participant study

P.VitaliPaoloon behalf of the HEAD Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tau PET imaging has emerged as a critical biomarker for Alzheimer's disease, informing diagnosis, staging, and therapeutic selection. We investigated whether PET tracer selection alters tau detection.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, within-participant comparison of [ 18F]flortaucipir (Tauvid), currently used in clinical settings in the USA and Europe, and [ 18F]MK6240, an investigational tau PET tracer. Participants were recruited from eight north American sites and underwent tau PET, amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, and detailed cognitive assessments. Tau PET with both agents was acquired within a 45-day window. Coprimary outcomes were the discriminative accuracy for Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive impairment and the frequency of tau positivity in early medial temporal lobe (MTL) and late neocortical regions. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05361382.

FINDINGS: Between March 2, 2022, and Aug 27, 2025, 775 individuals were enrolled, with 682 completing all procedures (373 [55%] female, 309 [45%] male; 38 [6%] aged 19-27 years, 214 [31%] aged 50-65 years, and 430 [63%] aged 65-89 years). 32 (5%) participants identified as Hispanic or Latino. 637 (93%) identified as White, 24 (4%) as Black or African American, 16 (2%) as Asian, and five (1%) as other. In addition, 49 (7%) individuals were identified as being from a rural area. [ 18F]MK6240 showed greater accuracy than [ 18F]flortaucipir in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease from non-Alzheimer's disease impairment (area under the curve 0·93, 95% CI 0·89-0·95 vs 0·86, 0·75-0·91; p<0·0001). Among the older adults, tau positivity status was concordant in 560 (87%) for MTL and 603 (94%) for neocortical regions. In cognitively unimpaired participants, [ 18F]MK6240 identified twice as many MTL-positive cases as [ 18F]flortaucipir (n=54 [15%] vs n=23 [6%]). Prevalence ratio in Aβ-positive was 2·43 (95% CI 1·50-3·94; p=0·0003), identifying 23 additional cases per 100. Among discordant cases, 75 (89%) were [ 18F]MK6240-positive only and had higher Aβ burden (p<0·0001), APOEε4 frequency (p<0·0001), and cognitive impairment (p=0·0043) than those negative on both tracers. Neocortical tau positivity was more frequent with [ 18F]MK6240 than with [ 18F]flortaucipir in cognitively impaired individuals (80 [28%] vs 46 [16%]). Prevalence ratio in Aβ-positive was 1·74 (95% CI 1·32-2·29; p<0·0001), identifying 15 additional mild cognitive impairment and 21 dementia cases per 100.

INTERPRETATION: Tau PET tracer selection influences the frequency of detection of tau pathology across the ageing and Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Compared with [ 18F]flortaucipir, [ 18F]MK6240 identified more individuals with tau pathology in cognitively unimpaired and cognitively impaired individuals, with direct implications for patient stratification in clinical trials and more precise guidance for therapeutic decision-making.

FUNDING: National Institute on Aging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2217-2226
Number of pages10
JournalThe Lancet
Volume407
Issue number10544
DOIs
StatePublished - May 30 2026

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Alzheimer Disease/diagnostic imaging
  • Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism
  • Carbolines
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Fluorine Radioisotopes
  • Positron-Emission Tomography/methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pyridines
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • tau Proteins/metabolism
  • Isoquinolines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of [18F]flortaucipir and [18F]MK6240 for the detection of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease (HEAD): a multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional, within-participant study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this