Abstract
The in vitro and in vivo efficacy of roxithromycin was compared with that of erythromycin, against a methicillin-susceptible strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. We performed standard in vitro testing (MIC, MBC, and time-kill kinetics) for roxithromycin, erythromycin, and rifampin. Both macrolides were bacteriostatic in vitro. There was no significant difference in microbial survival between erythromycin and roxithromycin groups in the time-kill kinetics (p = 0.3). For the in vivo experiments, using the rabbit experimental endocarditis model, roxithromycin was found to be inferior to erythromycin in decreasing the microbial burden of the endocardial vegetations (p <0.05). Rifampin was highly effective, both in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, the efficacy of roxithromycin was poor and inferior to erythromycin against a strain of methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis. Copyright (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-54 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1998 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Microbiology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacy of roxithromycin and erythromycin against a strain of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus epidermidis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS