TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative analysis of Onyx, squid, and n-BCA in middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma
T2 - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Mortezaei, Ali
AU - Al-Saidi, Nadir
AU - Ghorbi, Leila
AU - Taghlabi, Khaled M.
AU - Hajikarimloo, Bardia
AU - Habibi, Mohammad Amin
AU - Mohammadzadeh, Ibrahim
AU - Rahmani, Redi
AU - Srinivasan, Visish M.
AU - Burkhardt, Jan Karl
AU - Faraji, Amir H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Selection of an embolic agent for middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in a chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a subject of debate and is limited to observational data. We report the first meta-analysis that exclusively assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to address this gap. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, incorporating all available RCTs that compared MMAE plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone for cSDH usingeither Onyx, n-BCA, and Squid as embolic agent for embolization. Primary outcomes were the rate of hematoma recurrence/progression and the need for reoperation. Secondary outcomes included serious adverse events (SAE), all-cause mortality, functional independence (defined as a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2), and the rate of successful embolization. To assess heterogeneity, a fixed-effect or random-effects model was applied, depending on statistical significance (I²>50%, P < 0.1). Results: Four RCTs, with 894 patients in the MMAE plus SOC group and 914 patients in the SOC alone group, were identified and met our standard for analysis. Results revealed significant superiority of n-BCA compared to Onyx and Squid in lower all-cause mortality at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in using Onyx, Squid, and n-BCA in recurrence at the last follow-up (P = 0.36), reoperation at the last follow-up (P = 0.55), and successful embolization (P = 0.52), and 90-day functional independence (P = 0.076) between trials. Additionally, further analysis on safety outcomes showed no significant difference between embolic agents in SAE at last follow-up (P = 0.78), embolization-related complications (P = 0.087), new onset ischemic stroke (P = 0.98), and deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.94). Conclusion: This meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that while n-BCA is associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to Onyx and Squid in MMAE for cSDH, all three embolic agents demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety.
AB - Background: Selection of an embolic agent for middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in a chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a subject of debate and is limited to observational data. We report the first meta-analysis that exclusively assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to address this gap. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, incorporating all available RCTs that compared MMAE plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone for cSDH usingeither Onyx, n-BCA, and Squid as embolic agent for embolization. Primary outcomes were the rate of hematoma recurrence/progression and the need for reoperation. Secondary outcomes included serious adverse events (SAE), all-cause mortality, functional independence (defined as a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2), and the rate of successful embolization. To assess heterogeneity, a fixed-effect or random-effects model was applied, depending on statistical significance (I²>50%, P < 0.1). Results: Four RCTs, with 894 patients in the MMAE plus SOC group and 914 patients in the SOC alone group, were identified and met our standard for analysis. Results revealed significant superiority of n-BCA compared to Onyx and Squid in lower all-cause mortality at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in using Onyx, Squid, and n-BCA in recurrence at the last follow-up (P = 0.36), reoperation at the last follow-up (P = 0.55), and successful embolization (P = 0.52), and 90-day functional independence (P = 0.076) between trials. Additionally, further analysis on safety outcomes showed no significant difference between embolic agents in SAE at last follow-up (P = 0.78), embolization-related complications (P = 0.087), new onset ischemic stroke (P = 0.98), and deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.94). Conclusion: This meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that while n-BCA is associated with lower all-cause mortality compared to Onyx and Squid in MMAE for cSDH, all three embolic agents demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety.
KW - Chronic subdural hematoma
KW - Embolic agents
KW - Middle meningeal artery embolization
KW - Onyx
KW - Squid
KW - n-BCA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005522850&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105005522850&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00234-025-03651-9
DO - 10.1007/s00234-025-03651-9
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105005522850
SN - 0028-3940
JO - Neuroradiology
JF - Neuroradiology
ER -