TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical laboratory reports in molecular pathology
AU - Gulley, Margaret L.
AU - Braziel, Rita M.
AU - Halling, Kevin C.
AU - Hsi, Eric D.
AU - Kant, Jeffrey A.
AU - Nikiforova, Marina N.
AU - Nowak, Jan A.
AU - Ogino, Shuji
AU - Oliveira, Andre
AU - Polesky, Herbert F.
AU - Silverman, Lawrence
AU - Tubbs, Raymond R.
AU - Van Deerlin, Vivianna M.
AU - Vance, Gail H.
AU - Versalovic, James
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - Context. - Molecular pathology is a rapidly growing area of laboratory medicine in which DNA and RNA are analyzed. The recent introduction of array technology has added another layer of complexity involving massive parallel analysis of multiple genes, transcripts, or proteins. Objective. - As molecular technologies are increasingly implemented in clinical settings, it is important to bring uniformity to the way that test results are reported. Data Sources. - The College of American Pathologists Molecular Pathology Resource Committee members summarize elements that are already common to virtually all molecular pathology reports, as set forth in the College of American Pathologists checklists used in the laboratory accreditation process. Consensus recommendations are proposed to improve report format and content, and areas of controversy are discussed. Resources are cited that promote use of proper gene nomenclature and that describe methods for reporting mutations, translocations, microsatellite instability, and other genetic alterations related to inherited disease, cancer, identity testing, microbiology, and pharmacogenetics. Conclusions. - These resources and recommendations provide a framework for composing patient reports to convey molecular test results and their clinical significance to members of the health care team.
AB - Context. - Molecular pathology is a rapidly growing area of laboratory medicine in which DNA and RNA are analyzed. The recent introduction of array technology has added another layer of complexity involving massive parallel analysis of multiple genes, transcripts, or proteins. Objective. - As molecular technologies are increasingly implemented in clinical settings, it is important to bring uniformity to the way that test results are reported. Data Sources. - The College of American Pathologists Molecular Pathology Resource Committee members summarize elements that are already common to virtually all molecular pathology reports, as set forth in the College of American Pathologists checklists used in the laboratory accreditation process. Consensus recommendations are proposed to improve report format and content, and areas of controversy are discussed. Resources are cited that promote use of proper gene nomenclature and that describe methods for reporting mutations, translocations, microsatellite instability, and other genetic alterations related to inherited disease, cancer, identity testing, microbiology, and pharmacogenetics. Conclusions. - These resources and recommendations provide a framework for composing patient reports to convey molecular test results and their clinical significance to members of the health care team.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250175491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250175491&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 17550311
AN - SCOPUS:34250175491
SN - 0003-9985
VL - 131
SP - 852
EP - 863
JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
IS - 6
ER -