TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic mesenteric ischemia
T2 - 20 year experience of open surgical treatment
AU - Lejay, A.
AU - Georg, Y.
AU - Tartaglia, E.
AU - Creton, O.
AU - Lucereau, B.
AU - Thaveau, F.
AU - Geny, B.
AU - Chakfe, N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objectives: Both open surgery (OS) and endovascular surgery (ES) have been proposed for the treatment of symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI). OS was considered the gold standard but ES is increasingly proposed as the first option. The aim was to report long-term outcomes associated with OS in patients suffering CMI in the modern era in order to help in choose between the two techniques. Materials and methods: A retrospective single centre analysis of all consecutive digestive artery revascularizations performed for CMI between January 2003 and December 2012 was carried out. Primary outcomes were 30 day mortality and morbidity, and secondary outcomes were survival, primary patency (PP), secondary patency (SP), and freedom from digestive symptoms, depending on the completeness of the revascularization performed. Results: Eighty-six revascularizations were performed. Median follow up was 6.9 years (range 0.3-20.0). The 30 day mortality and morbidity rates were respectively 3.5% and 13.9%. Ten year survival was 88% for complete revascularization (CR) and 76% for incomplete revascularization (IR) (p = .54). The PP was 84% at 10 years for CR and 87% respectively for IR (p = .51). The 10 year SP was 92% for CR and 93% for IR (p = .63). Freedom from digestive symptoms was influenced by the completeness of revascularization: 79% for CR versus 65% for IR at 10 years (p = .04). Conclusions: OS for CMI, especially complete revascularization, provides lasting results despite high morbidity.
AB - Objectives: Both open surgery (OS) and endovascular surgery (ES) have been proposed for the treatment of symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI). OS was considered the gold standard but ES is increasingly proposed as the first option. The aim was to report long-term outcomes associated with OS in patients suffering CMI in the modern era in order to help in choose between the two techniques. Materials and methods: A retrospective single centre analysis of all consecutive digestive artery revascularizations performed for CMI between January 2003 and December 2012 was carried out. Primary outcomes were 30 day mortality and morbidity, and secondary outcomes were survival, primary patency (PP), secondary patency (SP), and freedom from digestive symptoms, depending on the completeness of the revascularization performed. Results: Eighty-six revascularizations were performed. Median follow up was 6.9 years (range 0.3-20.0). The 30 day mortality and morbidity rates were respectively 3.5% and 13.9%. Ten year survival was 88% for complete revascularization (CR) and 76% for incomplete revascularization (IR) (p = .54). The PP was 84% at 10 years for CR and 87% respectively for IR (p = .51). The 10 year SP was 92% for CR and 93% for IR (p = .63). Freedom from digestive symptoms was influenced by the completeness of revascularization: 79% for CR versus 65% for IR at 10 years (p = .04). Conclusions: OS for CMI, especially complete revascularization, provides lasting results despite high morbidity.
KW - Chronic mesenteric ischaemia
KW - Mesenteric vascular disease
KW - Open surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933179056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933179056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.01.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 25728455
AN - SCOPUS:84933179056
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 49
SP - 587
EP - 592
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 5
ER -