TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of two populations of human coronary artery endothelial cells
AU - Wu, Huakang
AU - Yao, Qizhi
AU - Lumsden, Alan B.
AU - Chen, Changyi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004/5/1
Y1 - 2004/5/1
N2 - Background Heterogeneity of endothelial cells may affect angiogenesis, vascular healing, and cardiovascular disease formation. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize populations of human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs), their gene expression levels, and response to TNF-α stimulation. Materials and methods Commercial HCAECs were cultured with EGM-2 complete medium. Cell population was determined by flow cytometry analysis based on size-scatter distribution. Gene expression for each population with or without TNF-α (1 ng/ml) stimulation for 16 h was also studied by flow cytometry analysis with proper gating and fluorescence labeling of antibodies. Results Two distinguished populations, HCAEC-I (small) and HCAEC-II (large), were identified through all passages (from 2 to 10) during cultures. Both HCAEC-I and HCAEC-II showed more than 90% positive staining for both von Willebrand factor and CD31 and were negative for CD34 and CD4 (less than 2%). HCAEC-I had substantially higher expression of cadherin-5 (71.91% versus 51.07%) than HCAEC-II. HCAEC-I also expressed much higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) (17.35% versus 0.77%), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (44.64% versus 2.54%), VCAM-1 (6.08% versus 1.18%), E-selectin (18.68% versus 1.42%), CXCR4 (61.05% versus 7.98%), and CCR5 (48.66% versus 1.97%) than HCAEC-II. HCAEC-II, however, had substantially higher expression of P1H12 (93.07% versus 58.73%) and ICAM-1 (94.37% versus 58.62%) than HCAEC-I. Following TNF-α stimulation, both populations substantially increased the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin. HCAEC-I, however, had much higher expressions of VEGFR-2, eNOS, CXCR4, and CCR-5 than HACEC-II after TNF-α stimulation. Conclusions These data demonstrate that commercial HCAECs have two distinguished populations with different gene expression patterns and different responses following TNF-α stimulation. This study indicates that the heterogeneity of HCAECs may have biologic or pathologic significances in coronary arteries.
AB - Background Heterogeneity of endothelial cells may affect angiogenesis, vascular healing, and cardiovascular disease formation. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize populations of human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs), their gene expression levels, and response to TNF-α stimulation. Materials and methods Commercial HCAECs were cultured with EGM-2 complete medium. Cell population was determined by flow cytometry analysis based on size-scatter distribution. Gene expression for each population with or without TNF-α (1 ng/ml) stimulation for 16 h was also studied by flow cytometry analysis with proper gating and fluorescence labeling of antibodies. Results Two distinguished populations, HCAEC-I (small) and HCAEC-II (large), were identified through all passages (from 2 to 10) during cultures. Both HCAEC-I and HCAEC-II showed more than 90% positive staining for both von Willebrand factor and CD31 and were negative for CD34 and CD4 (less than 2%). HCAEC-I had substantially higher expression of cadherin-5 (71.91% versus 51.07%) than HCAEC-II. HCAEC-I also expressed much higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) (17.35% versus 0.77%), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) (44.64% versus 2.54%), VCAM-1 (6.08% versus 1.18%), E-selectin (18.68% versus 1.42%), CXCR4 (61.05% versus 7.98%), and CCR5 (48.66% versus 1.97%) than HCAEC-II. HCAEC-II, however, had substantially higher expression of P1H12 (93.07% versus 58.73%) and ICAM-1 (94.37% versus 58.62%) than HCAEC-I. Following TNF-α stimulation, both populations substantially increased the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin. HCAEC-I, however, had much higher expressions of VEGFR-2, eNOS, CXCR4, and CCR-5 than HACEC-II after TNF-α stimulation. Conclusions These data demonstrate that commercial HCAECs have two distinguished populations with different gene expression patterns and different responses following TNF-α stimulation. This study indicates that the heterogeneity of HCAECs may have biologic or pathologic significances in coronary arteries.
KW - Adhesion molecules
KW - Chemokine receptors
KW - Endothelial cells
KW - eNOS
KW - Flow cytometry
KW - Gene expression
KW - Human coronary artery
KW - TNF-α
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842839920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842839920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2004.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2004.01.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 15093715
AN - SCOPUS:1842839920
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 118
SP - 38
EP - 44
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 1
ER -