TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors
AU - Weng, F. L.
AU - Lee, D. C.
AU - Dhillon, N.
AU - Tibaldi, K. N.
AU - Davis, L. A.
AU - Patel, A. M.
AU - Goldberg, R. J.
AU - Morgievich, M.
AU - Mulgaonkar, S.
N1 - Funding Information:
F.L.W. and L.A.D are supported in part by grants R01DK098744 and R01MD007664 from the National Institutes of Health . Preliminary results from this manuscript were presented in May 2015 at the American Transplant Congress in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Background Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) can be impeded by multiple barriers. One possible barrier to LDKT is a large physical distance between the living donor's home residence and the procuring transplant center. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-center study of living kidney donors in the United States who were geographically distant (residing ≥150 miles) from our transplant center. Each distant donor was matched to 4 geographically nearby donors (<150 miles from our center) as controls. Results From 2007 to 2010, of 429 live kidney donors, 55 (12.8%) were geographically distant. Black donors composed a higher proportion of geographically distant vs nearby donors (34.6% vs 15.5%), whereas Hispanic and Asian donors composed a lower proportion (P =.001). Distant vs nearby donors had similar median times from donor referral to actual donation (165 vs 161 days, P =.81). The geographically distant donors lived a median of 703 miles (25% to 75% range, 244 to 1072) from our center and 21.2 miles (25% to 75% range, 9.8 to 49.7) from the nearest kidney transplant center. The proportion of geographically distant donors who had their physician evaluation (21.6%), psychosocial evaluation (21.6%), or computed tomography angiogram (29.4%) performed close to home, rather than at our center, was low. Conclusions Many geographically distant donors live close to transplant centers other than the procuring transplant center, but few of these donors perform parts of their donor evaluation at these closer centers. Black donors comprise a large proportion of geographically distant donors. The evaluation of geographically distant donors, especially among minorities, warrants further study.
AB - Background Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) can be impeded by multiple barriers. One possible barrier to LDKT is a large physical distance between the living donor's home residence and the procuring transplant center. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-center study of living kidney donors in the United States who were geographically distant (residing ≥150 miles) from our transplant center. Each distant donor was matched to 4 geographically nearby donors (<150 miles from our center) as controls. Results From 2007 to 2010, of 429 live kidney donors, 55 (12.8%) were geographically distant. Black donors composed a higher proportion of geographically distant vs nearby donors (34.6% vs 15.5%), whereas Hispanic and Asian donors composed a lower proportion (P =.001). Distant vs nearby donors had similar median times from donor referral to actual donation (165 vs 161 days, P =.81). The geographically distant donors lived a median of 703 miles (25% to 75% range, 244 to 1072) from our center and 21.2 miles (25% to 75% range, 9.8 to 49.7) from the nearest kidney transplant center. The proportion of geographically distant donors who had their physician evaluation (21.6%), psychosocial evaluation (21.6%), or computed tomography angiogram (29.4%) performed close to home, rather than at our center, was low. Conclusions Many geographically distant donors live close to transplant centers other than the procuring transplant center, but few of these donors perform parts of their donor evaluation at these closer centers. Black donors comprise a large proportion of geographically distant donors. The evaluation of geographically distant donors, especially among minorities, warrants further study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995910879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995910879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.042
DO - 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 27569925
AN - SCOPUS:84995910879
SN - 0041-1345
VL - 48
SP - 1934
EP - 1939
JO - Transplantation Proceedings
JF - Transplantation Proceedings
IS - 6
ER -