TY - JOUR
T1 - Candidate imaging biomarkers for PMP22-related inherited neuropathies
AU - Roth, Alison R.
AU - Li, Jun
AU - Dortch, Richard D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Lauren Brooks for her assistance with patient recruitment. The authors also thank our MRI technologists (Clair Jones, Leslie McIntosh, Kristen George‐Durrett, and Chris Thompsom) for their expertise and support. This study was supported by NIH/NCATS R21 TR003312 (R. D. D. and J. L.) and Detroit Medical Center (DMC) Foundation #2018–3328 (J. L.).
Funding Information:
This study was supported by NIH/NCATS R21 TR003312 (R. D. D. and J. L.) and Detroit Medical Center (DMC) Foundation #2018–3328 (J. L).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Objective: Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP) are caused by mutations to the peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) gene. A need exists for sensitive and reliable biomarkers of progression and treatment response. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics of nerve pathology and morphology were investigated for this purpose. Methods: MRI was performed at 3.0 T in the thigh of CMT1A (N = 11) and HNPP patients (N = 12) and controls (N = 23). Three potential imaging biomarkers of the sciatic nerve were investigated: 1) magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), which assays myelin content, and 2) cross-sectional area (CSA) and 3) circularity, which assay morphological changes. Potential imaging biomarkers were compared across cohorts and assessed for relationships with disability in the legs (CMTESL), compound motor action potentials (CMAP), and motor conduction velocities (MCV). Inter-rater reliability and test–retest repeatability were established for each imaging metric. Results: Significant differences in MTR, CSA, and circularity were observed in CMT1A relative to controls (p = 0.02, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively, via Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). Differences were not observed in the HNPP cohort. Significant relationships were observed between MTR and clinical metrics (CMTESL: p = 0.003, CMAP: p = 0.03, MCV: p = 0.01); and between CSA and electrophysiology (CMAP: p = 0.002, MCV: p < 0.001). All metrics were reliable and repeatable with MTR the most reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >0.999, CV = 0.30%) and repeatable (ICC = 0.84, CV = 3.16%). Interpretation: MTR, CSA, and circularity showed promise as reliable and sensitive biomarkers of CMT1A, but not HNPP. These warrant longitudinal investigation as response biomarkers in upcoming clinical trials of CMT1A, while other methods should be considered for HNPP.
AB - Objective: Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP) are caused by mutations to the peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) gene. A need exists for sensitive and reliable biomarkers of progression and treatment response. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics of nerve pathology and morphology were investigated for this purpose. Methods: MRI was performed at 3.0 T in the thigh of CMT1A (N = 11) and HNPP patients (N = 12) and controls (N = 23). Three potential imaging biomarkers of the sciatic nerve were investigated: 1) magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), which assays myelin content, and 2) cross-sectional area (CSA) and 3) circularity, which assay morphological changes. Potential imaging biomarkers were compared across cohorts and assessed for relationships with disability in the legs (CMTESL), compound motor action potentials (CMAP), and motor conduction velocities (MCV). Inter-rater reliability and test–retest repeatability were established for each imaging metric. Results: Significant differences in MTR, CSA, and circularity were observed in CMT1A relative to controls (p = 0.02, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively, via Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). Differences were not observed in the HNPP cohort. Significant relationships were observed between MTR and clinical metrics (CMTESL: p = 0.003, CMAP: p = 0.03, MCV: p = 0.01); and between CSA and electrophysiology (CMAP: p = 0.002, MCV: p < 0.001). All metrics were reliable and repeatable with MTR the most reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] >0.999, CV = 0.30%) and repeatable (ICC = 0.84, CV = 3.16%). Interpretation: MTR, CSA, and circularity showed promise as reliable and sensitive biomarkers of CMT1A, but not HNPP. These warrant longitudinal investigation as response biomarkers in upcoming clinical trials of CMT1A, while other methods should be considered for HNPP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131164175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131164175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/acn3.51561
DO - 10.1002/acn3.51561
M3 - Article
C2 - 35656877
AN - SCOPUS:85131164175
VL - 9
SP - 925
EP - 935
JO - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
JF - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
SN - 2328-9503
IS - 7
ER -