Cancer risk in normal weight individuals with metabolic obesity: A narrative review

Bethina Liu, Hugh E. Giffney, Rhonda S. Arthur, Thomas E. Rohan, Andrew J. Dannenberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    22 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Obesity represents one of the most significant public health challenges worldwide. Current clinical practice relies on body mass index (BMI) to define the obesity status of an individual, even though the index has long been recognized for its limitations as a measure of body fat. In normal BMI individuals, increased central adiposity has been associated with worse health outcomes, including increased risks of cardiovascular disease and metabolic disorders. The condition leading to these outcomes has been described as metabolic obesity in the normal weight (MONW). More recent evidence suggests that MONW is associated with increased risk of several obesity-related malignancies, including postmenopausal breast, endometrial, colorectal, and liver cancers. In MONW patients, the false reassurance of a normal range BMI can lead to lost opportunities for implementing preventive interventions that may benefit a substantial number of people. A growing body of literature has documented the increased risk profile of MONW individuals and demonstrated practical uses for body composition and biochemical analyses to identify this at-risk population. In this review, we survey the current literature on MONW and cancer, summarize pathophysiology and oncogenic mechanisms, highlight potential strategies for diagnosis and treatment, and suggest directions for future research.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)509-520
    Number of pages12
    JournalCancer Prevention Research
    Volume14
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2021

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology
    • Cancer Research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer risk in normal weight individuals with metabolic obesity: A narrative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this