Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

CALR frameshift mutation detection in myeloproliferative neoplasms by microfluidic chip analysis

Michael P. Greenwood, Keith M. Newton, Kristi L. Pepper, Heather L. Hendrickson, Randall J. Olsen, Jessica S. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background CALR mutation analysis is routinely used to diagnose BCR/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. The 2 most common CALR mutations are a 52-base pair (bp) deletion and a 5-bp insertion, which account for approximately 85% of cases. Methods To evaluate our new microfluidic chip assay, we tested CALR mutant and wild-type specimens that were previously analyzed using conventional methods at a reference laboratory. Samples included EDTA-anticoagulated peripheral blood and bone marrow specimens, air dried bone marrow aspirate smears, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded bone marrow sections. CALR exon 9 was PCR amplified using 2 previously published primer pairs and a third unique primer pair designed for our new assay. Amplicons were sized using microfluidic chip analysis. Results Concordance with the reference method was 100% (42/42). Intra-run and inter-run reproducibility were also 100% (3/3 and 3/3, respectively). The limit of detection was confirmed to be 6% mutant alleles. Conclusion We determined that the microfluidic chip assay to detect CALR exon 9 mutations was acceptable for clinical use. Compared with the conventional method, the microfluidic analysis assay benefits from a streamlined workflow, faster turnaround, and a smaller instrument footprint.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-350
Number of pages8
JournalLaboratory Medicine
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2025

Keywords

  • CALR mutation
  • microfluidic chip analysis
  • myeloproliferative neoplasm
  • polymerase chain reaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CALR frameshift mutation detection in myeloproliferative neoplasms by microfluidic chip analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this