Breast Conservation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Surgical Results from the BrighTNess Randomized Clinical Trial

Mehra Golshan, Sibylle Loibl, Stephanie M. Wong, Jens Bodo Houber, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Hope S. Rugo, Norman Wolmark, Mark D. McKee, David Maag, Danielle M. Sullivan, Otto Metzger-Filho, Gunter Von Minckwitz, Charles E. Geyer, William M. Sikov, Michael Untch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is often administered to enable breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in stages II to III breast cancer.

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the role of NST in conversion from BCT ineligibility to BCT eligibility and to assess the association of response to NST, germline BRCA (gBRCA) status, and region of treatment with surgical choice in women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Design, Setting, and Participants: This prespecified secondary analysis of a multicentered, phase 3, double-blind, randomized clinical trial (BrighTNess) enrolled 634 eligible women across 145 centers in 15 countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. Women with operable, clinical stages II to III TNBC who underwent gBRCA mutation testing before initiating NST were eligible to participate. Data were collected from April 1, 2014, to December 8, 2016. This preplanned analysis was performed from January 5, 2018, to October 28, 2019.

Interventions: Study participants were randomized to receive 12 weeks of weekly paclitaxel alone or with the addition of carboplatin and/or veliparib, followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Surgeons assessed BCT candidacy by clinical and radiographic criteria before and after NST. Surgical choices and whether BCT eligibility was associated with the likelihood of pathologic complete response were then analyzed.

Results: Among the 634 randomized patients (median age, 51 [range, 22-78] years), pre- and post-NST assessments were available for 604 patients. Of 141 patients deemed BCT ineligible at baseline, 75 (53.2%) converted to BCT eligible. Overall, 342 (68.1%) of 502 patients deemed BCT eligible after NST underwent BCT, including 42 (56.0%) of the 75 who converted to BCT eligible. Patients treated in Europe and Asia were more likely to undergo BCT (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.84-3.84) compared with those treated in North America. Among patients without gBRCA mutation undergoing mastectomy, those treated in North America were more likely to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (57 of 81 [70.4%] vs 6 of 30 [20.0%]; P < .001). Rates of pathologic complete response were similar between patients deemed BCT eligible at baseline and those who were BCT ineligible but converted to BCT eligibility after NST (55.3 [235 of 425] vs 49.3% [37 of 75]; P = .38).

Conclusions and Relevance: This prospective analysis of NST and BCT eligibility in TNBC demonstrates a conversion from BCT ineligibility to BCT eligibility of 53.2%. Lower BCT rates among eligible patients and higher bilateral mastectomy rates among patients without gBRCA mutation in North America merit investigation.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02032277.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere195410
Pages (from-to)e195410
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume155
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Mastectomy, Segmental
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Patient Selection
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Young Adult

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast Conservation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Surgical Results from the BrighTNess Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this