TY - JOUR
T1 - Brain single-photon emission CT with HMPAO and safety of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke
T2 - Proceedings of the meeting of the SPECT Safe Thrombolysis Study Collaborators and the members of the Brain Imaging Council of the Society of Nuclear Medicine
AU - Alexandrov, Andrei V.
AU - Masdeu, Joseph C.
AU - Devous, Michael D.
AU - Black, Sandra E.
AU - Grotta, James C.
PY - 1997/9
Y1 - 1997/9
N2 - Background: To reliably identify patients at risk for symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (SHT), future trials of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke might use a vascular imaging protocol applicable to a multicenter setting. The goal of this commentary is to address the safety of intravenous thrombolysis with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) and potential solutions offered by single-photon emission CT (SPECT) as a noninvasive brain perfusion imaging modality. Summary of Review: Even if patients with severe stroke, extensive ischemic changes on CT scan, advanced age, and high blood pressure are excluded from thrombolytic therapy, this cannot completely guarantee the safety of using rTPA. Brain SPECT scanning with hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) may help to screen out patients at risk if performed in addition to clinical and CT tests. The knowledge of pretreatment severity, extent, and location of ischemia might identify good versus poor responders to rTPA therapy. HMPAO-SPECT is widely available and feasible to perform without delaying rTPA therapy. Rigorous quality control and use of reproducible visual and semiquantitative methods of interpreting SPECT are necessary for implementation of SPECT technology in multicenter clinical trials. Conclusions: The major obstacle to general acceptance of thrombolytic therapies and rTPA in particular is the fear of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, and because HMPAO-SPECT might reliably identify patients at high risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, the clinical value of HMPAO-SPECT in patient selection for thrombolysis during the flint hours of acute ischemic stroke should be determined through a prospective clinical trial.
AB - Background: To reliably identify patients at risk for symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (SHT), future trials of thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke might use a vascular imaging protocol applicable to a multicenter setting. The goal of this commentary is to address the safety of intravenous thrombolysis with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) and potential solutions offered by single-photon emission CT (SPECT) as a noninvasive brain perfusion imaging modality. Summary of Review: Even if patients with severe stroke, extensive ischemic changes on CT scan, advanced age, and high blood pressure are excluded from thrombolytic therapy, this cannot completely guarantee the safety of using rTPA. Brain SPECT scanning with hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO) may help to screen out patients at risk if performed in addition to clinical and CT tests. The knowledge of pretreatment severity, extent, and location of ischemia might identify good versus poor responders to rTPA therapy. HMPAO-SPECT is widely available and feasible to perform without delaying rTPA therapy. Rigorous quality control and use of reproducible visual and semiquantitative methods of interpreting SPECT are necessary for implementation of SPECT technology in multicenter clinical trials. Conclusions: The major obstacle to general acceptance of thrombolytic therapies and rTPA in particular is the fear of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, and because HMPAO-SPECT might reliably identify patients at high risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, the clinical value of HMPAO-SPECT in patient selection for thrombolysis during the flint hours of acute ischemic stroke should be determined through a prospective clinical trial.
KW - Thrombolytic therapy
KW - Tissue plasminogen
KW - Tomography, emission computed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030759007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030759007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/01.STR.28.9.1830
DO - 10.1161/01.STR.28.9.1830
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 9303032
AN - SCOPUS:0030759007
VL - 28
SP - 1830
EP - 1834
JO - Stroke
JF - Stroke
SN - 0039-2499
IS - 9
ER -