TY - JOUR
T1 - Benefit from exemestane as extended adjuvant therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen
T2 - Intention-to-treat analysis of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-33 trial
AU - Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
AU - Jeong, Jong Hyeon
AU - Lawrence Wickerham, D.
AU - Smith, Roy E.
AU - Ganz, Patricia A.
AU - Land, Stephanie R.
AU - Eisen, Andrea
AU - Fehrenbacher, Louis
AU - Farrar, William B.
AU - Atkins, James N.
AU - Pajon, Eduardo R.
AU - Vogel, Victor G.
AU - Kroener, Joan F.
AU - Hutchins, Laura F.
AU - Robidoux, André
AU - Hoehn, James L.
AU - Ingle, James N.
AU - Geyer, Charles E.
AU - Costantino, Joseph P.
AU - Wolmark, Norman
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Purpose: Patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer have considerable residual risk for recurrence after completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. In May 2001, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated accrual to a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane as extended adjuvant therapy in this setting. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal patients with clinical T1-3N1M0 breast cancer who were disease free after 5 years of tamoxifen were randomly assigned to 5 years of exemestane (25 mg/d orally) or 5 years of placebo. Our primary aim was to test whether exemestane prolongs disease-free survival (DFS). In October 2003, results of National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) MA.17 showing benefit from adjuvant letrozole in this setting necessitated termination of accrual to B-33, unblinding, and offering of exemestane to patients in the placebo group. Results At the time of unblinding, 1,598 patients had been randomly assigned; 72% in the exemestane group continued on exemestane and 44% in the placebo group elected to receive exemestane. With 30 months of median follow-up, original exemestane assignment resulted in a borderline statistically significant improvement in 4-year DFS (91% v 89%; relative risk [RR] = 0.68; P = .07) and in a statistically significant improvement in 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS; 96% v 94%; RR = 0.44; P = .004). Toxicity, assessed up to time of unblinding, was acceptable for the adjuvant setting. Conclusion: Despite premature closure and crossover to exemestane by a substantial proportion of patients, original exemestane assignment resulted in non-statistically significant improvement in DFS and in statistically significant improvement in RFS.
AB - Purpose: Patients with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer have considerable residual risk for recurrence after completing 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. In May 2001, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated accrual to a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane as extended adjuvant therapy in this setting. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal patients with clinical T1-3N1M0 breast cancer who were disease free after 5 years of tamoxifen were randomly assigned to 5 years of exemestane (25 mg/d orally) or 5 years of placebo. Our primary aim was to test whether exemestane prolongs disease-free survival (DFS). In October 2003, results of National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) MA.17 showing benefit from adjuvant letrozole in this setting necessitated termination of accrual to B-33, unblinding, and offering of exemestane to patients in the placebo group. Results At the time of unblinding, 1,598 patients had been randomly assigned; 72% in the exemestane group continued on exemestane and 44% in the placebo group elected to receive exemestane. With 30 months of median follow-up, original exemestane assignment resulted in a borderline statistically significant improvement in 4-year DFS (91% v 89%; relative risk [RR] = 0.68; P = .07) and in a statistically significant improvement in 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS; 96% v 94%; RR = 0.44; P = .004). Toxicity, assessed up to time of unblinding, was acceptable for the adjuvant setting. Conclusion: Despite premature closure and crossover to exemestane by a substantial proportion of patients, original exemestane assignment resulted in non-statistically significant improvement in DFS and in statistically significant improvement in RFS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42949104549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42949104549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0228
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0228
M3 - Article
C2 - 18332472
AN - SCOPUS:42949104549
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 26
SP - 1965
EP - 1971
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 12
ER -