Abstract
As part of the efforts of a multi-disciplinary, international working group focused on ethical issues in neuromodulation for neuro-psychiatric disorders, we propose a novel; strategy for study design which iteratively applies new knowledge to on-going and future trials. Under current practice, device studies may be closed or categorized as “failures” before knowledge embedded in them can be fully mined. We propose the use of an iterative process to gain knowledge from subjects who have responded to those who have not. This approach can help maximize outcomes in non-responders and inform the design of future studies. This more agile yet rigorous methodology leverages information at all stages of investigation and promotes both scientific discovery and; stewardship.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 181-186 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Brain Stimulation |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | Dec 23 2016 |
DOIs | |
State | E-pub ahead of print - Dec 23 2016 |
Keywords
- Deep brain stimulation
- Major depression
- Neuroethics
- Research methodology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Neuroscience
- Biophysics
- Clinical Neurology