TY - JOUR
T1 - Autonomy following revascularisation in 80-year-old patients with critical limb ischaemia
AU - Lejay, A.
AU - Thaveau, F.
AU - Georg, Y.
AU - Bajcz, C.
AU - Kretz, J. G.
AU - Chakfé, N.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Objectives: We wanted to compare autonomy recovery after open and endovascular infrainguinal surgery for critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in octogenarians. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 167 consecutive CLI octogenarians who underwent infrainguinal open surgery (OS) or endovascular surgery (ES) between 2003 and 2008. OS and ES groups were compared in terms of autonomy level (Parker score), survival, limb salvage and patency rates. Results: Preoperative autonomy level was similar in both groups (OS n = 109, ES n = 58) but 6-month postoperative autonomy level was better after ES (p = 0.01). There was a trend towards better survival after OS (74% at 1 year, 62% at 2 years, 32% at 4 years with OS and 68%, 50%, 17% respectively for ES p = 0.06), but no difference regarding limb salvage (91% at 1 year, 90% at 2 years, 89% at 4 years for OS and 94%, 87%, 86% respectively for ES, p = 0.939) and primary patency (76% at 1 year, 59% at 2 years, 50% at 4 years for OS and 82%, 75%, 32% respectively for ES, p = 0.467). Conclusions: ES is justified in CLI octogenarians, because it allows restoring a higher autonomy level, with limb salvage and patency rates comparable to OS.
AB - Objectives: We wanted to compare autonomy recovery after open and endovascular infrainguinal surgery for critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in octogenarians. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 167 consecutive CLI octogenarians who underwent infrainguinal open surgery (OS) or endovascular surgery (ES) between 2003 and 2008. OS and ES groups were compared in terms of autonomy level (Parker score), survival, limb salvage and patency rates. Results: Preoperative autonomy level was similar in both groups (OS n = 109, ES n = 58) but 6-month postoperative autonomy level was better after ES (p = 0.01). There was a trend towards better survival after OS (74% at 1 year, 62% at 2 years, 32% at 4 years with OS and 68%, 50%, 17% respectively for ES p = 0.06), but no difference regarding limb salvage (91% at 1 year, 90% at 2 years, 89% at 4 years for OS and 94%, 87%, 86% respectively for ES, p = 0.939) and primary patency (76% at 1 year, 59% at 2 years, 50% at 4 years for OS and 82%, 75%, 32% respectively for ES, p = 0.467). Conclusions: ES is justified in CLI octogenarians, because it allows restoring a higher autonomy level, with limb salvage and patency rates comparable to OS.
KW - Autonomy
KW - Critical limb ischaemia
KW - Endovascular surgery
KW - Octogenarians
KW - Open surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869488608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869488608&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.09.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.09.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 23040530
AN - SCOPUS:84869488608
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 44
SP - 562
EP - 567
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 6
ER -