TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
AU - Choi, Eue Keun
AU - Chun, Eun Ju
AU - Choi, Sang Il
AU - Chang, Sung A.
AU - Choi, Sung Hee
AU - Lim, Soo
AU - Rivera, Juan J.
AU - Nasir, Khurram
AU - Blumenthal, Roger S.
AU - Jang, Hak Chul
AU - Chang, Hyuk Jae
PY - 2009/10/1
Y1 - 2009/10/1
N2 - We evaluated the characteristics of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). A total of 116 patients with DM without abnormal electrocardiographic findings or evidence of peripheral arterial disease (number of risk factors ≥2; 62 ± 7 years, 59% men) underwent CCTA and SPECT. Of the 116 patients with DM, 88 (76%) had a normal single photon emission computed tomographic findings, and 28 (24%) had abnormal perfusion defects. Of the 116 patients, 92 (79%) had atherosclerotic plaques (2 ± 2 segments per subject), and 20 (17%) had significant stenosis seen on CCTA. Patients with DM and normal findings on SPECT had a similar prevalence of atherosclerotic plaque (78% vs 82%), significant stenosis (15% vs 25%), severe stenosis (7% vs 7%), and calcified (40% vs 43%), mixed (49% vs 57%), and noncalcified plaques (26% vs 29%) and a high (>100) coronary artery calcium score (32% vs 29%; all p >0.05) compared to those with abnormal findings on SPECT. During the mid-term follow-up (24 ± 4 months), 5 cardiac events occurred in patients with DM and normal findings on SPECT, only in those with occult CAD on CCTA: 1 sudden cardiac death and 4 revascularization procedures. In conclusion, a significant percentage of patients with DM and normal eletrocardiographic findings, no peripheral arterial disease, and normal findings on SPECT have evidence of occult CAD on CCTA. Furthermore, a small percentage had had a cardiac event by mid-term follow-up. SPECT showed limited capability to differentiate the coronary risks between patients with DM and no coronary plaque and from those with a certain degree of disease; 2 circumstances that represent different coronary risks.
AB - We evaluated the characteristics of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). A total of 116 patients with DM without abnormal electrocardiographic findings or evidence of peripheral arterial disease (number of risk factors ≥2; 62 ± 7 years, 59% men) underwent CCTA and SPECT. Of the 116 patients with DM, 88 (76%) had a normal single photon emission computed tomographic findings, and 28 (24%) had abnormal perfusion defects. Of the 116 patients, 92 (79%) had atherosclerotic plaques (2 ± 2 segments per subject), and 20 (17%) had significant stenosis seen on CCTA. Patients with DM and normal findings on SPECT had a similar prevalence of atherosclerotic plaque (78% vs 82%), significant stenosis (15% vs 25%), severe stenosis (7% vs 7%), and calcified (40% vs 43%), mixed (49% vs 57%), and noncalcified plaques (26% vs 29%) and a high (>100) coronary artery calcium score (32% vs 29%; all p >0.05) compared to those with abnormal findings on SPECT. During the mid-term follow-up (24 ± 4 months), 5 cardiac events occurred in patients with DM and normal findings on SPECT, only in those with occult CAD on CCTA: 1 sudden cardiac death and 4 revascularization procedures. In conclusion, a significant percentage of patients with DM and normal eletrocardiographic findings, no peripheral arterial disease, and normal findings on SPECT have evidence of occult CAD on CCTA. Furthermore, a small percentage had had a cardiac event by mid-term follow-up. SPECT showed limited capability to differentiate the coronary risks between patients with DM and no coronary plaque and from those with a certain degree of disease; 2 circumstances that represent different coronary risks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249112224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249112224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.026
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 19766752
AN - SCOPUS:70249112224
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 104
SP - 890
EP - 896
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 7
ER -