Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider

Tanya P. Hoke, Alexander A. Berger, Christine C. Pan, Lindsey A. Jackson, William D. Winkelman, Rachel High, Katherine A. Volpe, Chee Paul Lin, Holly E. Richter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Understanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees. Methods: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher’s exact) test was used to test for associations. Results: Six hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 ± 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45–60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years’ experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45–60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5–15 or > 15 years’ experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence. Conclusion: Patient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45–60 years old with > 5 years’ experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1203-1208
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

Keywords

  • Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery
  • Gender
  • Medical learners
  • Patient preferences
  • Training
  • Urogynecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this