TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing mechanical integrity of spinal fusion by in situ endochondral osteoinduction in the murine model
AU - Dewan, Ashvin K.
AU - Dewan, Rahul A.
AU - Calderon, Nathan
AU - Fuentes, Angie
AU - Lazard, Za Waunyka
AU - Davis, Alan R.
AU - Heggeness, Michael
AU - Hipp, John A.
AU - Olmsted-Davis, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by an Alpha Omega Alpha Carolyn L. Kuckein Student Research Fellowship, DOD W81XWH-07-1-0281, and DARPA W911NF-09-1-0040.
PY - 2010/8/21
Y1 - 2010/8/21
N2 - Background: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice.Methods: Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion.Results: Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection.Conclusions: Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT.
AB - Background: Historically, radiographs, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) exams, palpation and histology have been used to assess fusions in a mouse spine. The objective of this study was to develop a faster, cheaper, reproducible test to directly quantify the mechanical integrity of spinal fusions in mice.Methods: Fusions were induced in ten mice spine using a previously described technique of in situ endochondral ossification, harvested with soft tissue, and cast in radiolucent alginate material for handling. Using a validated software package and a customized mechanical apparatus that flexed and extended the spinal column, the amount of intervertebral motion between adjacent vertebral discs was determined with static flexed and extended lateral spine radiographs. Micro-CT images of the same were also blindly reviewed for fusion.Results: Mean intervertebral motion between control, non-fused, spinal vertebral discs was 6.1 ± 0.2° during spine flexion/extension. In fusion samples, adjacent vertebrae with less than 3.5° intervertebral motion had fusions documented by micro-CT inspection.Conclusions: Measuring the amount of intervertebral rotation between vertebrae during spine flexion/extension is a relatively simple, cheap (<$100), clinically relevant, and fast test for assessing the mechanical success of spinal fusion in mice that compared favorably to the standard, micro-CT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956414696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956414696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1749-799X-5-58
DO - 10.1186/1749-799X-5-58
M3 - Article
C2 - 20727195
AN - SCOPUS:77956414696
VL - 5
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
SN - 1749-799X
IS - 1
M1 - 58
ER -