Applying for NIH Grants

Carl W. Lejuez, Elizabeth K. Reynolds, Will M. Aklin, B. Christopher Frueh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

One of the most important and daunting roles of the early academic is the pursuit of NIH grant funding. Although NIH funding allows for great autonomy and comes with validation and prestige, the process can feel overwhelming even for the most seasoned investigators. Therefore, being armed with information is crucial. Aiming to provide a guide to NIH grants with the early stage investigator in mind, this chapter outlines many of the key issues you will tackle throughout the process. These include: a) Developing Your Idea; b) Finding the Right Mechanism for You and Your Idea; c) Preparing Your Application; d) Submission and Receipt of Your Application; e) The Review Process; and f) Post-Review Strategies. These issues are addressed in light of the recent changes in the NIH grant submission and review process to provide an objective source, complimented by our favorite tips for your consideration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Portable Mentor
Subtitle of host publicationExpert Guide to a Successful Career in Psychology
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages284-302
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781108903264
ISBN (Print)9781108794381
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022

Keywords

  • K Awards
  • NIH
  • R Grants
  • funding mechanism
  • grants
  • persistence
  • recent changes
  • review process
  • success

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology
  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying for NIH Grants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this